Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;118:1920-1928
Published online before print October 20, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.787754
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/19/1920    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.787754v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dick, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tevaearai, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dick, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tevaearai, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*HEPARIN
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Other Research
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;118:1920-1928.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cardiovascular Surgery

Basic Control of Reperfusion Effectively Protects Against Reperfusion Injury in a Realistic Rodent Model of Acute Limb Ischemia

Florian Dick, MD*; Jianhui Li, MD*; Marie-Noëlle Giraud, PhD; Christoph Kalka, MD; Juerg Schmidli, MD; Hendrik Tevaearai, MD, eMBA

From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (F.D., J.L., M.-N.G., J.S., H.T.) and Division of Angiology (C.K.), Inselspital, and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland; Imperial College Vascular Surgery Research Group, Division of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Biology and Anaesthetics, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK (F.D.); and Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China (J.L.).

Correspondence to Marie-Noëlle Giraud, PhD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, and University of Bern, 3010 Berne, Switzerland. E-mail marie-noelle.giraud-flueck{at}insel.ch

Received April 22, 2008; accepted September 3, 2008.

Background— Reperfusion injury is insufficiently addressed in current clinical management of acute limb ischemia. Controlled reperfusion carries an enormous clinical potential and was tested in a new reality-driven rodent model.

Methods and Results— Acute hind-limb ischemia was induced in Wistar rats and maintained for 4 hours. Unlike previous tourniquets models, femoral vessels were surgically prepared to facilitate controlled reperfusion and to prevent venous stasis. Rats were randomized into an experimental group (n=7), in which limbs were selectively perfused with a cooled isotone heparin solution at a limited flow rate before blood flow was restored, and a conventional group (n=7; uncontrolled blood reperfusion). Rats were killed 4 hours after blood reperfusion. Nonischemic limbs served as controls. Ischemia/reperfusion injury was significant in both groups; total wet-to-dry ratio was 159±44% of normal (P=0.016), whereas muscle viability and contraction force were reduced to 65±13% (P=0.016) and 45±34% (P=0.045), respectively. Controlled reperfusion, however, attenuated reperfusion injury significantly. Tissue edema was less pronounced (132±16% versus 185±42%; P=0.011) and muscle viability (74±11% versus 57±9%; P=0.004) and contraction force (68±40% versus 26±7%; P=0.045) were better preserved than after uncontrolled reperfusion. Moreover, subsequent blood circulation as assessed by laser Doppler recovered completely after controlled reperfusion but stayed durably impaired after uncontrolled reperfusion (P=0.027).

Conclusions— Reperfusion injury was significantly alleviated by basic modifications of the initial reperfusion period in a new in vivo model of acute limb ischemia. With this model, systematic optimizations of according protocols may eventually translate into improved clinical management of acute limb ischemia.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 1911-1912. [Extract] [Full Text]