This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Patel, N. D. Articles by Conte, J. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Patel, N. D. Articles by Conte, J. V. Related Collections Congestive CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy

(Circulation. 2008;118:S83-S88.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cardiac Transplantation and Surgery for Heart Failure

Impact of Donor-to-Recipient Weight Ratio on Survival After Heart Transplantation

Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database

Nishant D. Patel, BA; Eric S. Weiss, MD; Lois U. Nwakanma, MD; Stuart D. Russell, MD; William A. Baumgartner, MD; Ashish S. Shah, MD; John V. Conte, MD

From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (N.D.P., E.S.W., L.U.N., W.A.B., A.S.S., J.V.C.) and the Division of Cardiology (S.D.R.), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence to John V. Conte, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Associate Chief of Cardiac Surgery, Chief of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 600 North Wolfe Street/Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail jconte{at}csurg.jhmi.jhu.edu

Background— Generally accepted donor criteria for heart transplantation limit allografts from donors within approximately 20% to 30% of the recipient’s weight. We analyzed the impact of donor-to-recipient weight ratio on survival after heart transplantation.

Methods and Results— Adult heart transplant recipients reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 1999 to 2007 were divided into 3 groups based on donor-to-recipient weight ratio: <0.8, 0.8 to 1.2, and >1.2. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox regression modeling was used to analyze predictors of mortality. A total of 15 284 heart transplant recipients were analyzed; 2078 had weight ratio of <0.8, 9684 had 0.8 to 1.2, and 3522 had >1.2. Kaplan-Meier survival was not statistically different between groups at 5 years (P=0.26). Among patients with weight ratio <0.8, 5-year survival was lower for recipients with high pulmonary vascular resistance (>4 Woods units; P=0.02). Among recipients with high pulmonary vascular resistance, 5-year survival was similar for those with weight ratio 0.8 to 1.2 and >1.2 (P=0.44). Furthermore, male recipients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance who received hearts from female donors had a significantly worse survival than males who received hearts from male donors (P=0.01). Propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis demonstrated that weight ratio <0.8 did not predict mortality (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.27; P=0.21). Five-year survival after propensity matching was not statistically different between those with weight ratio <0.8 versus 0.8 (P=0.37).

Conclusions— Weight ratio did not predict mortality after heart transplantation. However, recipients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance who received undersized hearts had poor survival. Furthermore, in the setting of high pulmonary vascular resistance, male recipients who received hearts from female donors had worse survival than those who received hearts from male donors. Extending donor criteria to include undersized hearts in select recipients should be considered.

Key Words: heart transplantation • heart failure • donor criteria