Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;118:S199-S209
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735902
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kita, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kita, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
*Coronary Artery Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2008;118:S199-S209.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease

Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the Bare-Metal Stent Era

Takeshi Kimura, MD; Takeshi Morimoto, MD; Yutaka Furukawa, MD; Yoshihisa Nakagawa, MD; Satoshi Shizuta, MD; Natsuhiko Ehara, MD; Ryoji Taniguchi, MD; Takahiro Doi, MD; Kei Nishiyama, MD; Neiko Ozasa, MD; Naritatsu Saito, MD; Kozo Hoshino, MD; Hirokazu Mitsuoka, MD; Mitsuru Abe, MD; Masanao Toma, MD; Toshihiro Tamura, MD; Yoshisumi Haruna, MD; Yukiko Imai, MpH; Satoshi Teramukai, PhD; Masanori Fukushima, MD; Toru Kita, MD

From the Department of Cardiovascular of Medicine (T. Kimura, H.M., T. Kita) and the Center for Medical Education (T.M.), Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University; the Division of Cardiology (Y.F., S.S., T.D., N.O., N.S., M.T., T.T.), Kyoto University Hospital; the Division of Cardiology (Y.N.), Tenri Hospital; the Division of Cardiology (N.E.), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital; the Division of Cardiology (R.T.), Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Hospital; Emergency Medicine (K.N.), Kyoto University Hospital the Division of Cardiology (K.H.), Nagai Hospital; the Division of Cardiology (M.A.), National Cardiovascular Center; the Division of Cardiology (Y.H.), Keihanna Hospital; Translational Research Informatics Center (Y.I.), Foundation for Biomedical Research Innovation; and the Translational Research Center (S.T., M.F.), Kyoto University Hospital, Japan.

Correspondence to Takeshi Kimura, Department of Cardiovascular of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan. E-mail taketaka{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Background— Observational registries comparing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have reported long-term survival results that are discordant with those of randomized trials.

Methods and Results— We conducted a multicenter study in Japan enrolling consecutive patients undergoing first CABG or PCI between January 2000 and December 2002. Among 9877 patients enrolled, 5420 (PCI: 3712, CABG: 1708) had multivessel disease without left main involvement. Because age is an important determinant when choosing revascularization strategies, survival analysis was stratified by either age ≥75 or <75 years. Analyses were also performed in other relevant subgroups. Median follow-up interval was 1284 days with 95% follow-up rate at 2 years. At 3 years, unadjusted survival rates were 91.7% and 89.6% in the CABG and PCI groups, respectively (log rank P=0.26). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, survival outcome tended to be better after CABG (hazard ratio for death after PCI versus CABG [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23 [0.99-1.53], P=0.06). Adjusted survival outcomes also tended to be better for CABG among elderly patients (HR [95%CI]: 1.37 [0.98-1.92] P=0.07), but not among nonelderly patients (HR [95% CI]: 1.09 [0.82-1.46], P=0.55). Unadjusted and adjusted survival outcome for CABG and PCI were not significantly different in any subgroups when elderly patients were excluded from analysis.

Conclusions— In the CREDO-Kyoto registry, survival outcomes among patients <75 years of age were similar after PCI and CABG, a result that is consistent with those of randomized trials.


Key Words: coronary artery disease • percutaneous coronary intervention • coronary stent • coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery • long-term outcome