Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:1145-1152
Published online before print February 11, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/9/1145    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aguirre, F. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mikell, F. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aguirre, F. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mikell, F. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:1145-1152.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Health Services and Outcomes Research

Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

The Stat Heart Program

Frank V. Aguirre, MD; Joji J. Varghese, MD; Michael P. Kelley, MD; Wilfred Lam, MD; Charles L. Lucore, MD; John B. Gill, MD; Lisa Page, RN; Leah Turner, BS; Conrad Davis, CCA; Frank L. Mikell, MD; for the Stat Heart Investigators

From Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, Ltd (F.V.A., M.P.K., W.L., C.L.L., J.B.G., F.L.M.); Department of Internal Medicine (F.V.A., J.J.V., W.L.) and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (F.V.A., M.P.K., W.L., C.L.L., J.B.G., F.L.M.), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine; Prairie Education and Research Cooperative (L.T., C.D.); and Prairie Care Alliance (L.P.), Springfield, Ill.

Correspondence to Frank V. Aguirre, MD, FACC, FAHA, Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, Ltd, PO Box 19420, Springfield, IL 62794–9420. E-mail faguirre{at}prairieheart.com

Received July 16, 2007; accepted December 28, 2007.

Background— In Europe, interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from non–PCI-capable (STEMI-referral) to PCI-capable (STEMI-accepting) facilities has been shown to be a superior reperfusion strategy compared with on-site fibrinolysis. The feasibility of such programs in the United States remains poorly defined.

Methods and Results— We describe an observational cohort of 230 consecutive presumed STEMI patients who underwent interhospital transfer between January 2005 and March 2007 among 6 STEMI-referral and 2 STEMI-accepting hospitals in rural central Illinois. A standard treatment protocol using rapid interhospital transfer for primary PCI or rescue PCI after full-dose intravenous fibrinolysis (in event of unanticipated transfer delays) was initiated by the STEMI-referral emergency department physician. Three time intervals were evaluated: STEMI-referral care (door 1 to departure), transport time (door 1 departure to STEMI-accepting hospital arrival [door 2]), and STEMI-accepting hospital care (door 2 to balloon). Primary PCI was performed in 165 STEMI-confirmed patients (87.7%), whereas fibrinolysis was required in 16 patients (8.5%), with 56% undergoing rescue PCI. The median door 1–to-departure time was 46 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 62 minutes); approximately two thirds of this delay was attributable to the wait for transport arrival and departure. The transport and door 2–to-balloon times were 29 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 25 and 35 minutes) and 35 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 46 minutes), respectively. The door 1–to-balloon time was 117 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 98 and 137 minutes), with 12.2% and 58% of patients achieving a time of ≤90 and ≤120 minutes, respectively. No adverse clinical events occurred during interhospital transport.

Conclusion— In rural US communities, emergency department physician–initiated interhospital transfer of STEMI patients for primary or rescue PCI is feasible and was safely executed with achievement of timely reperfusion when performed within coordinated healthcare networks.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1121-1123. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
I. C. Rokos, W. J. French, W. J. Koenig, S. J. Stratton, B. Nighswonger, B. Strunk, J. Jewell, E. Mahmud, J. V. Dunford, J. Hokanson, et al.
Integration of Pre-Hospital Electrocardiograms and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Center (SRC) Networks: Impact on Door-to-Balloon Times Across 10 Independent Regions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. M. Antman
Time Is Muscle: Translation Into Practice
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 7, 2008; 52(15): 1216 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]