This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Circulation: June 10, 2008, Volume 117, Number 23 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Guru, V. Articles by Fremes, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Guru, V. Articles by Fremes, S. E. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research CV surgery: coronary artery disease Related Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:2969-2976.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Health Services and Outcomes Research

Relationship Between Preventability of Death After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and All-Cause Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates

Veena Guru, MD; Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD; Edward Etchells, MD, MSc; Geoffrey M. Anderson, MD, PhD; C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil; Richard J. Novick, MD, MSc; Christopher M. Feindel, MD, MSc; Fraser D. Rubens, MD, MSc; Kevin Teoh, MD, MSc; Avdesh Mathur, MD; Andrew Hamilton, MD; Daniel Bonneau, MD; Charles Cutrara, MD; Peter C. Austin, PhD; Stephen E. Fremes, MD, MSc

From the Institute For Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto (V.G., J.V.T., G.M.A., C.D.N., P.C.A., S.E.F.); Divisions of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery (V.G., S.E.F.) and General Internal Medicine (J.V.T., E.E., C.D.N.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Health Network (C.M.F.), and the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital (D.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto; Division of Cardiac Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London (R.J.N.); Division of Cardiac Surgery, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa (F.D.R.); Division of Cardiac Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton (K.T.); Division of Cardiac Surgery, Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury (A.M.); Division of Cardiac Surgery, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston (A.H.); and Division of Cardiac Surgery, Trillium Health Centre, Toronto (C.C.), Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr Veena Guru, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G-106, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5 Canada. E-mail veena.guru{at}utoronto.ca

Received June 17, 2007; accepted March 6, 2008.

Background— The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between all-cause, risk-adjusted, in-hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the proportion of preventable in-hospital deaths as a measure of quality of care at an institution level.

Methods and Results— We conducted a retrospective analysis of 347 randomly selected in-hospital deaths after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery at 9 institutions in Ontario over the period of 1998 to 2003. Nurse-abstracted chart summaries were reviewed by 2 experienced cardiac surgeons who were blinded to patient, surgeon, and hospital and used a standardized implicit tool to identify preventable death. A third reviewer reassessed all cases in which the first 2 reviewers disagreed. Rates of preventable deaths were estimated for each hospital and compared with all-cause mortality rates. A structured adverse event audit completed by each surgeon-reviewer was used to identify quality improvement opportunities for the preventable deaths. A total of 111 of 347 deaths (32%) were judged preventable despite a low risk-adjusted mortality range (1.3% to 3.1%) across hospitals. No significant correlation was found between all-cause, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates and the proportion of preventable deaths at the hospital level (Spearman coefficient, –0.42; P=0.26). A large proportion of preventable deaths were related to problems in the operating room (86%) and intensive care unit (61%). Many deaths were associated with deviations in perioperative care (32% based on concurrence of 2 reviewers, and another 42% in cases in which 1 reviewer reached that opinion).

Conclusions— Approximately one third of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft deaths were judged preventable by surgeon reviewers. All-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates are convenient measures of institutional quality of care but were not correlated with preventable mortality in our jurisdiction. Providers should conduct detailed adverse event audits to drive meaningful improvements in quality.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 2961-2962. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. M. Krumholz Medicine in the Era of Outcomes Measurement Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 141 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wright and K. G Shojania Measuring the quality of hospital care BMJ, March 18, 2009; 338(mar18_2): b569 - b569. [Full Text]

				K. G. Shojania MD and A. J. Forster MD MSc Hospital standardized mortality ratios Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 4, 2008; 179(10): 1037 - 1037. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Krumholz and S.-L. T. Normand Public Reporting of 30-Day Mortality for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure Circulation, September 23, 2008; 118(13): 1394 - 1397. [Full Text] [PDF]

				In-Hospital Death After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Preventable or Not? Journal Watch Cardiology, June 18, 2008; 2008(618): 1 - 1. [Full Text]

				H. M. Krumholz Seeking Better Outcomes in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Lessons From Past Experience Circulation, June 10, 2008; 117(23): 2963 - 2965. [Full Text] [PDF]