This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 117/20/2617    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.107.733675v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Miyazaki, C. Articles by Oh, J. K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miyazaki, C. Articles by Oh, J. K. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Failure Related Collections Congestive Echocardiography Related Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:2617-2625.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Heart Failure

Comparison of Echocardiographic Dyssynchrony Assessment by Tissue Velocity and Strain Imaging in Subjects With or Without Systolic Dysfunction and With or Without Left Bundle-Branch Block

Chinami Miyazaki, MD; Brian D. Powell, MD; Charles J. Bruce, MD; Raul E. Espinosa, MD; Margaret M. Redfield, MD; Fletcher A. Miller, MD; David L. Hayes, MD; Yong-Mei Cha, MD; Jae K. Oh, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Reprint requests to Jae K. Oh, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail oh.jae{at}mayo.edu

Received August 10, 2007; accepted February 11, 2008.

Background— Several echocardiographic dyssynchrony indexes have been proposed to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy using tissue velocity and strain. The present study aimed to compare tissue velocity–derived and strain-derived dyssynchrony indexes in patients with or without systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block.

Methods and Results— Tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 120 subjects divided into 4 groups: group 1 (n=40), normal subjects; group 2 (n=20), normal left ventricular ejection fraction and left bundle-branch block; group 3 (n=20), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and normal conduction; and group 4 (n=40), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and left bundle-branch block. Dyssynchrony indexes based on time to peak tissue velocity (septal-lateral delay, anteroseptal-posterior delay, and SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments) and strain (SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments) were measured. The SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments was greater in group 4 (54 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 46 to 64 ms) than group 1 (44 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 28 to 53 ms; P=0.006), but there was a considerable overlap of all tissue velocity–derived indexes among 4 groups, with 40% to 68% of group 1 having values proposed for predicting the responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy. The SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments distinguished these groups with much less overlap (P<0.01 for all pairwise comparisons).

Conclusions— A substantial proportion of normal subjects have tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes higher than the cutoff value proposed for predicting beneficial effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Strain-derived timing index appears to be more specific for dyssynchrony in patients with systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block. Identifying an optimal tissue velocity– or strain-derived dyssynchrony index requires a large prospective clinical trial.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 2567-2569. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Abraham and T. P. Abraham Is echocardiographic assessment of dyssynchrony useful to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy?: Echocardiography Is Useful Before Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy if QRS Duration Is Available Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2008; 1(1): 79 - 85. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Marwick Hype and Hope in the Use of Echocardiography for Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The Tower of Babel Revisited Circulation, May 20, 2008; 117(20): 2573 - 2576. [Full Text] [PDF]