Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:268-275
Published online before print July 2, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690396
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/3/268    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690396v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hood, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hood, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Circulation. 2007;116:268-275.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension

The Spironolactone, Amiloride, Losartan, and Thiazide (SALT) Double-Blind Crossover Trial in Patients With Low-Renin Hypertension and Elevated Aldosterone-Renin Ratio

Susan J. Hood, RGN; Kevin P. Taylor, MSc; Michael J. Ashby, BSc; Morris J. Brown, FMedSci

From the Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge (S.J.H., M.J.A., M.J.B.), and Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrookes Hospital (K.P.T.), Cambridge, UK.

Correspondence to Professor Morris Brown, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Box 110, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. E-mail m.j.brown{at}cai.cam.ac.uk

Received December 10, 2006; accepted May 11, 2007.

Background— There is continuing variation in diagnosis and estimated prevalence of primary hyperaldosteronism. The higher estimates encourage search for adrenal adenomas in patients with elevated ratios of plasma aldosterone to renin. However, it is more likely that patients with normal plasma K+ and aldosterone belong to the polygenic spectrum of low-renin hypertension rather than have the same monogenic syndrome as classic Conn’s. Our primary hypothesis was that in low-renin patients with normal plasma K+ and aldosterone, a thiazide diuretic, bendroflumethiazide, would be as effective as spironolactone in overcoming the Na+ retention and lowering blood pressure. Secondary objectives were to compare the dose response for each diuretic and to evaluate amiloride as an alternative to spironolactone.

Methods and Results— Fifty-seven patients entered and 51 patients completed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover trial. Entry criteria included low plasma renin, normal K+, elevated aldosterone-renin ratio, and a previous systolic blood pressure response to spironolactone of ≥20 mm Hg. Two doses each of spironolactone and bendroflumethiazide were compared. The crossover also included amiloride and losartan. Outcome measures were blood pressure, plasma renin, and other biochemical markers of diuretic action. Spironolactone 100 mg and bendroflumethiazide 5 mg caused similar falls in systolic blood pressure, whereas bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg was 5/2 mm Hg less effective in reducing blood pressure than either bendroflumethiazide 5 mg or spironolactone 50 mg (P<0.005). Amiloride 40 mg was as effective as the other diuretics. Biochemical indices of natriuresis showed bendroflumethiazide to be less effective than either spironolactone or amiloride; plasma renin rose 4-fold on spironolactone but only 2-fold on bendroflumethiazide (P=0.003).

Conclusions— In hypertensive patients with a low plasma renin but normal K+, bendroflumethiazide 5 mg was as effective as spironolactone 100 mg in lowering blood pressure, despite patients being selected for a previous large fall in blood pressure on spironolactone. Because this result differs from that expected in primary hyperaldosteronism, our finding argues against low-renin hypertension including a large, undiagnosed pool of primary hyperaldosteronism. However, spironolactone was the more effective natriuretic agent, suggesting that inappropriate aldosterone release or response may still contribute to the Na+ retention of low-renin hypertension.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Brown
Aliskiren
Circulation, August 12, 2008; 118(7): 773 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
B Rayner
Primary aldosteronism and aldosterone-associated hypertension
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 61(7): 825 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. M. C. Connell, S. M. MacKenzie, E. M. Freel, R. Fraser, and E. Davies
A Lifetime of Aldosterone Excess: Long-Term Consequences of Altered Regulation of Aldosterone Production for Cardiovascular Function
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 133 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Mulatero, A. Milan, and F. Veglio
Letter Regarding Article by Hood et al, "The Spironolactone, Amiloride, Losartan, and Thiazide (SALT) Double-Blind Crossover Trial in Patients With Low-Renin Hypertension and Elevated Aldosterone-Renin Ratio"
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): e151 - e151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M. J Brown
Renin: friend or foe?
Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1026 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]