Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:1120-1127
Published online before print August 20, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.702720
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/10/1120    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.702720v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: aortic and vascular disease
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2007;116:1120-1127.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cardiovascular Surgery

Aortic Diameter ≥5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection

Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

Linda A. Pape, MD; Thomas T. Tsai, MD; Eric M. Isselbacher, MD; Jae K. Oh, MD; Patrick T. O’Gara, MD; Arturo Evangelista, MD; Rossella Fattori, MD; Gabriel Meinhardt, MD; Santi Trimarchi, MD; Eduardo Bossone, MD; Toru Suzuki, MD; Jeanna V. Cooper, MS; James B. Froehlich, MD, MPH; Christoph A. Nienaber, MD; Kim A. Eagle, MD, on behalf of the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators

From the University of Massachusetts Medical School (L.A.P.), Worcester, Mass; University of Michigan (T.T.T., J.V.C., J.B.F., K.A.E.), Ann Arbor, Mich; Massachusetts General Hospital (E.M.I.), Boston, Mass; Mayo Clinic (J.K.O.), Rochester, Minn; Brigham and Women’s Hospital (P.T.O.), Boston, Mass; Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron (A.E.), Barcelona, Spain; University Hospital S. Orsola (R.F.), Bologna, Italy; Robert-Bosch Krankenhaus (G.M.), Stuttgart, Germany; Istituto Policlinico San Donato (S.T.), San Donato Milanese, Italy; National Research Council (E.B.), Lecce, Italy; University of Tokyo (T.S.), Tokyo, Japan; University Hospital Rostock (C.A.N.), Rostock, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Linda Pape, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA 01655. E-mail linda.pape{at}umassmed.edu

Received March 16, 2007; accepted July 3, 2007.

Background— Studies of aortic aneurysm patients have shown that the risk of rupture increases with aortic size. However, few studies of acute aortic dissection patients and aortic size exist. We used data from our registry of acute aortic dissection patients to better understand the relationship between aortic diameter and type A dissection.

Methods and Results— We examined 591 type A dissection patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection between 1996 and 2005 (mean age, 60.8 years). Maximum aortic diameters averaged 5.3 cm; 349 (59%) patients had aortic diameters <5.5 cm and 229 (40%) patients had aortic diameters <5.0 cm. Independent predictors of dissection at smaller diameters (<5.5 cm) included a history of hypertension (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 4.57; P=0.04), radiating pain (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 4.0; P=0.03), and increasing age (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.05; P=0.03). Marfan syndrome patients were more likely to dissect at larger diameters (odds ratio, 14.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 100; P=0.002). Mortality (27% of patients) was not related to aortic size.

Conclusions— The majority of patients with acute type A acute aortic dissection present with aortic diameters <5.5 cm and thus do not fall within current guidelines for elective aneurysm surgery. Methods other than size measurement of the ascending aorta are needed to identify patients at risk for dissection.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2007 116: 1107. [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. J. Patel and G. M. Deeb
Ascending and Arch Aorta: Pathology, Natural History, and Treatment
Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 188 - 195.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Nistri, J. Grande-Allen, M. Noale, C. Basso, P. Siviero, S. Maggi, G. Crepaldi, and G. Thiene
Aortic elasticity and size in bicuspid aortic valve syndrome
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 472 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]