| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;115:792-799.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science for Clinicians |
From the Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Department of Pediatrics, Childrens Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Correspondence to Jeffrey Robbins, PhD, Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039. E-mail jeff.robbins{at}cchmc.org
It was only
15 years ago that methodologies evolved to the point where we began to manipulate the genetic apparatus of the mouse such that proteins of the investigators choice could be expressed in a 4-chambered, mammalian heart. Our abilities to express both normal and mutated proteins in the heart or to create genetic nulls in which the protein is not expressed at all continue to evolve. With the tools now available, one can target protein expression to the different cell types present in the heart, often at a particular time, and, in some cases, turn off the protein as development progresses or the animal ages. These abilities have enabled us to model many of the genetic mutations identified as causative for pediatric and/or adult cardiovascular disease and heart failure. Identifying the primary genetic cause is, more often than not, insufficient for designing effective therapeutics or interventions. Therefore, it is critical to be able to develop animal models that accurately recapitulate the pathogenic processes that ensue as a result of mutant gene expression or loss of protein expression. In this review, we discuss the nature, strengths, and weaknesses of the current set of tools for developing genetically manipulated mouse models, as well as the relevance of these models for understanding cardiovascular disease and illuminating potential therapeutic avenues.
Key Words: cardiovascular diseases genes molecular biology
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Balani, F. C. Brito, L. Kos, and A. Agarwal Melanocyte pigmentation stiffens murine cardiac tricuspid valve leaflet J R Soc Interface, November 6, 2009; 6(40): 1097 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dinkel, S. H. Bartling, J. Kuntz, M. Grasruck, A. Kopp-Schneider, M. Iwasaki, S. Dimmeler, R. Gupta, W. Semmler, H.-U. Kauczor, et al. Intrinsic Gating for Small-Animal Computed Tomography: A Robust ECG-Less Paradigm for Deriving Cardiac Phase Information and Functional Imaging Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2008; 1(3): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Davis, M. V. Westfall, D. Townsend, M. Blankinship, T. J. Herron, G. Guerrero-Serna, W. Wang, E. Devaney, and J. M. Metzger Designing Heart Performance by Gene Transfer Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1567 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Hinton Jr., C. M. Alfieri, S. A. Witt, B. J. Glascock, P. R. Khoury, D. W. Benson, and K. E. Yutzey Mouse heart valve structure and function: echocardiographic and morphometric analyses from the fetus through the aged adult Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2480 - H2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. George Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ leak in heart failure: mere observation or functional relevance? Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2008; 77(2): 302 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ashrafian, M. P. Frenneaux, and L. H. Opie Metabolic Mechanisms in Heart Failure Circulation, July 24, 2007; 116(4): 434 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |