Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
« Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article »
Circulation. 2007;115:2856-2864
Published online before print May 28, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/22/2856    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hachicha, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pibarot, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hachicha, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pibarot, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2007;115:2856-2864.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Valvular Heart Disease

Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival

Zeineb Hachicha, MD; Jean G. Dumesnil, MD; Peter Bogaty, MD; Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PhD

From the Laval Hospital Research Center/Quebec Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.

Correspondence to Drs Philippe Pibarot and Jean G. Dumesnil, Laval Hospital Research Center, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V-4G5. E-mail philippe.pibarot{at}med.ulaval.ca or medjgd@hermes.ulaval.ca

Received October 15, 2006; accepted March 26, 2007.

Background— Recent studies and current clinical observations suggest that some patients with severe aortic stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxically have a relatively low gradient despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The objective of the present study was to document the prevalence, potential mechanisms, and clinical relevance of this phenomenon.

Methods and Results— We retrospectively studied the clinical and Doppler echocardiographic data of 512 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (indexed aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2 · m–2) and preserved LV ejection fraction (≥50%). Of these patients, 331 (65%) had normal LV flow output defined as a stroke volume index >35 mL · m2, and 181 (35%) had paradoxically low-flow output defined as stroke volume index ≤35 mL · m–2. When compared with normal flow patients, low-flow patients had a higher prevalence of female gender (P<0.05), a lower transvalvular gradient (32±17 versus 40±15 mm Hg; P<0.001), a lower LV diastolic volume index (52±12 versus 59±13 mL · m–2; P<0.001), lower LV ejection fraction (62±8% versus 68±7%; P<0.001), a higher level of LV global afterload reflected by a higher valvulo-arterial impedance (5.3±1.3 versus 4.1±0.7 mm Hg · mL–1 · m–2; P<0.001) and a lower overall 3-year survival (76% versus 86%; P=0.006). Only age (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.08; P=0.025), valvulo-arterial impedance >5.5 mm Hg · mL–1 · m–2 (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.7; P=0.017), and medical treatment (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.7; P=0.0003) were independently associated with increased mortality.

Conclusion— Patients with severe aortic stenosis may have low transvalvular flow and low gradients despite normal LV ejection fraction. A comprehensive evaluation shows that this pattern is in fact consistent with a more advanced stage of the disease and has a poorer prognosis. Such findings are clinically relevant because this condition may often be misdiagnosed, which leads to a neglect and/or an underestimation of symptoms and an inappropriate delay of aortic valve replacement surgery.

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CirculationHome page
J.-L. Monin, P. Lancellotti, M. Monchi, P. Lim, E. Weiss, L. Pierard, and P. Gueret
Risk Score for Predicting Outcome in Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, July 7, 2009; 120(1): 69 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. L. Hannan, Z. Samadashvili, S. J. Lahey, C. R. Smith, A. T. Culliford, R. S.D. Higgins, J. P. Gold, and R. H. Jones
Aortic Valve Replacement for Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Risk Factors and Their Impact on 30-Month Mortality.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1741 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
P V Ennezat, S Marechaux, B Iung, C Chauvel, T H LeJemtel, and P Pibarot
Exercise testing and exercise stress echocardiography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis
Heart, June 1, 2009; 95(11): 877 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
D. Cramariuc, G. Cioffi, A. E. Rieck, R. B. Devereux, E. M. Staal, S. Ray, K. Wachtell, and E. Gerdts
Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis in Asymptomatic Patients: Valvular-Arterial Impedance and Systolic Function From the SEAS Substudy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 390 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil
Aortic Stenosis: Look Globally, Think Globally
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 400 - 403.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart J SupplHome page
K. Wachtell
Left ventricular systolic performance in asymptomatic aortic stenosis
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., July 1, 2008; 10(suppl_E): E16 - E22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart J SupplHome page
N. Jander
Low-gradient 'severe' aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: new entity, or discrepant definitions?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., July 1, 2008; 10(suppl_E): E11 - E15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
J. J. Kaden and D. Haghi
Hypertension in aortic valve stenosis--a Trojan horse
Eur. Heart J., June 26, 2008; (2008) ehn306v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
F. A. Flachskampf
Severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and apparently preserved left ventricular systolic function--under-recognized or overdiagnosed?
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 966 - 968.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
J. Minners, M. Allgeier, C. Gohlke-Baerwolf, R.-P. Kienzle, F.-J. Neumann, and N. Jander
Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 1043 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Weyman
The Year in Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 25, 2008; 51(12): 1221 - 1229.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
M. Poullis and R. Warwick
Letter by Poullis and Warwick Regarding Article, "Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival"
Circulation, December 18, 2007; 116(25): e573 - e573.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, P. Bogaty, and Z. Hachicha
Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival"
Circulation, December 18, 2007; 116(25): e574 - e574.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
B. A. Carabello
Aortic Stenosis: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2799 - 2800.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search
Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited.