Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;115:2697-2704
Published online before print May 14, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668673
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/21/2697    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668673v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klemm, H. U.
Right arrow Articles by Willems, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klemm, H. U.
Right arrow Articles by Willems, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery

(Circulation. 2007;115:2697-2704.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Catheter Ablation of Multiple Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction Guided by Combined Contact and Noncontact Mapping

Hanno U. Klemm, MD, MSc*; Rodolfo Ventura, MD*; Daniel Steven, MD; Christin Johnsen, MD; Thomas Rostock, MD; Boris Lutomsky, MD; Tim Risius, MD; Thomas Meinertz, MD; Stephan Willems, MD

From the University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Correspondence to Hanno U. Klemm, MD, MSc, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail h.klemm{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

Received October 5, 2006; accepted March 30, 2007.

Background— Insights gained from noncontact mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT) have not been systematically applied to contact maps. This study sought to unify both techniques for an individualized approach to the patient with multiple ischemic VTs irrespective of cycle length.

Methods and Results— For 12 consecutive patients with chronic myocardial infarction and recurrent VT, bipolar contact maps were acquired during sinus or paced rhythm. Additional noncontact maps were obtained during 48 induced VTs (cycle length 192 to 579 ms). Endocardial exit sites were superimposed on contact maps and verified by pace-mapping. Radiofrequency lesions were extended for critical borders defined by multiple neighboring exits and followed the isovoltage contour line of contact maps. Nine critical borders were identified in 8 patients and constituted the substrate for 31 VTs. The voltage at exit sites was 0.8 mV (range 0.1 to 2.3). Noncontact maps revealed 23±18% of isthmus conduction. Thirty-seven (77%) of all and 83% of clinically documented VTs were rendered noninducible irrespective of cycle length by application of 27 radiofrequency lesions (range 18 to 56). Spontaneous transitions between distinct VTs along critical borders were demonstrated in 4 patients. Pace-mapping reproduced the QRS morphology of 81% of VTs and was associated with successful ablation (P<0.01). Noninducibility of any sustained VT was reached for 8 (67%) patients. During 15 months (range 5 to 28) of follow-up, 8 patients remained without recurrence, and VT episodes were reduced in the other 4 patients (P<0.01). VT cycle length was not predictive for acute or long-term success.

Conclusion— The combined approach of contact and noncontact mapping effectively defines critical borders as the substrate of multiple VTs without limitation for unstable VTs.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE