Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;115:1354-1362
Published online before print March 12, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.657619
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/11/1354    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.657619v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garot, P.
Right arrow Articles by Louvard, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garot, P.
Right arrow Articles by Louvard, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*CPR
*Emergency Medical Services
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow CPR and emergency cardiac care
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2007;115:1354-1362.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Health Services and Outcomes Research

Six-Month Outcome of Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Resuscitated Patients After Cardiac Arrest Complicating ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Philippe Garot, MD; Thierry Lefevre, MD; Hélène Eltchaninoff, MD, PhD; Marie-Claude Morice, MD; Fabienne Tamion, MD; Bernard Abry, MD; Pierre-François Lesault, MD; Jean-Yves Le Tarnec, MD; Claude Pouges, MD; Alain Margenet, MD; Mehran Monchi, MD; Ivan Laurent, MD; Pierre Dumas, MD; Jérôme Garot, MD, PhD; Yves Louvard, MD

From Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Massy and Quincy (P.G., T.L., M.-C.M., B.A., M.M., I.L., P.D., Y.L.); Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Charles Nicolle, Rouen (H.E., F.T., P.-F.L.); Service Aide Médicale d’Urgence Seine-et-Marne, Melun (J.-Y.L.T.); Service Aide Médicale d’Urgence Essonne, Corbeil-Essonnes (C.P.); Service Aide Médicale d’Urgence Val-de-Marne, Créteil (A.M.); and Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor, Créteil (J.G.), France.

Correspondence to Philippe Garot, MD, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Centre Hospitalier Claude Galien, 20 Route de Boussy, 91480 Quincy, France. E-mail p.garot{at}icps.com.fr

Received August 13, 2006; accepted January 5, 2007.

Background— The outcome of resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction remains poor, primarily because of the relatively low success rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation management. Existing data suggest potential beneficial effects of early myocardial reperfusion, but the predictors of survival in these patients remain unknown.

Methods and Results— From 1995 to 2005, 186 patients (78% men; mean age, 60.4±13.8 years) underwent immediate percutaneous coronary intervention after successful resuscitation for cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction. Prompt prehospital management was performed by mobile medical care units in 154 of 186 patients, whereas 32 had in-hospital cardiac arrest. Infarct location was anterior in 105 patients (56%), and shock was present on admission in 96 (52%). Percutaneous coronary intervention (stenting rate 90%) was successful in 161 of 186 patients (87%). Six-month survival rate was 100 of 186 (54%), and 6-month survival free of neurological sequelae was 46%. By multivariate analysis, predictors of 6-month survival were a shorter interval between the onset of cardiac arrest and arrival of a first responder (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.84), a shorter interval between the onset of cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.96), and absence of diabetes (odds ratio, 7.30; 95% CI, 1.80 to 29.41).

Conclusions— In patients with resuscitated cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction, prompt prehospital management and early revascularization were associated with a 54% survival rate at 6 months. A strategy including adequate prehospital management, early revascularization, and specific care in dedicated intensive care units should be strongly considered in resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction.


Key Words: angioplasty • cardiopulmonary resuscitation • heart arrest • myocardial infarction • shock


Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2007 115: 1333. [Full Text]