This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 114/9/945    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634584v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sagristà-Sauleda, J. Articles by Soler-Soler, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sagristà-Sauleda, J. Articles by Soler-Soler, J. Related Collections Pericardial disease

(Circulation. 2006;114:945-952.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Pericardial Disease

Low-Pressure Cardiac Tamponade

Clinical and Hemodynamic Profile

Jaume Sagristà-Sauleda, MD; Juan Angel, MD; Antonia Sambola, MD; Joan Alguersuari, MD; Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda, MD; Jordi Soler-Soler, MD

From Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

Reprint requests to Jaume Sagristà-Sauleda, Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron, P Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail jsagrist{at}vhebron.net

Received April 18, 2006; revision received June 21, 2006; accepted June 23, 2006.

Background— Low-pressure cardiac tamponade is a form of cardiac tamponade in which a comparatively low pericardial pressure results in cardiac compression because of low filling pressure. This syndrome is poorly characterized because only isolated cases have been reported. We conducted a study of its clinical and hemodynamic profiles.

Methods and Results— From 1986 through 2004, we evaluated all patients at our institution with combined pericardiocentesis and cardiac catheterization. We identified those patients who fulfilled catheterization-based criteria of low-pressure cardiac tamponade and compared their clinical and catheterization data with those of patients with classic tamponade. A total of 1429 patients with pericarditis were evaluated, 279 of whom underwent combined pericardiocentesis and catheterization. Criteria of low-pressure cardiac tamponade were met in 29, whereas 114 had criteria of classic cardiac tamponade. Patients with low-pressure tamponade less frequently had clinical signs of tamponade, but the rate of constitutional symptoms, use of diuretics, and echocardiographic findings of tamponade were similar in both groups. Patients with low-pressure tamponade showed a significant increase in cardiac output after pericardiocentesis, but they usually had less severe cardiac tamponade compared with patients with classic tamponade. Prognosis was related mainly to the underlying disease.

Conclusions— Low-pressure cardiac tamponade was identified in 20% of patients with catheterization-based criteria of tamponade. Clinical recognition may be difficult because of the absence of typical physical findings of tamponade in most patients. Although some patients are critically ill, most show a stable clinical condition. However, these patients obtain a clear benefit from pericardiocentesis.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Sagrista-Sauleda, J. Angel, A. Sambola, and G. Permanyer-Miralda Hemodynamic Effects of Volume Expansion in Patients With Cardiac Tamponade Circulation, March 25, 2008; 117(12): 1545 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]