Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:I-145-I-151
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Myogenesis

(Circulation. 2006;114:I-145 – I-151.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cell Transplantation and Tissue Engineering

Differential Effect of Intracoronary Infusion of Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells by Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor on Left Ventricular Function and Remodeling in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Versus Old Myocardial Infarction

The MAGIC Cell-3-DES Randomized, Controlled Trial

Hyun-Jae Kang, MD; Hae-Young Lee, MD; Sang-Hoon Na, MD; Sung-A Chang, MD; Kyung-Woo Park, MD; Hyung-Kwan Kim, MD; Song-Yi Kim, MD; Ho-Joon Chang, MD; Whal Lee, MD; Won Jun Kang, MD; Bon-Kwon Koo, MD; Yong-Jin Kim, MD; Dong Soo Lee, MD; Dae-Won Sohn, MD; Kyou-Sup Han, MD; Byung-Hee Oh, MD; Young-Bae Park, MD; Hyo-Soo Kim, MD

From the Cardiovascular Laboratory, Clinical Research Institute (H-J.K., H-Y.L., S-H.N., S-A.C., K-W.P., H-K.K., S-Y.K., H-J.C., B-K.K., Y-J.K., D-W.S., B-H.O., Y-B.P., H-S.K.), Cardiovascular Center (H-J.K., H-Y.L., S-H.N., S-A.C., K-W.P., H-K.K., S-Y.K., H-J.C., B-K.K., Y-J.K., D-W.S., B-H.O., Y-B.P., H-S.K.), Department of Internal Medicine (H-J.K., H-Y.L., S-H.N., S-A.C., K-W.P., H-K.K., S-Y.K., H-J.C., B-K.K., Y-J.K., D-W.S., B-H.O., Y-B.P., H-S.K.), Department of Radiology (W.L.), Department of Nuclear Medicine (W.J.K., D.S.L.), and Department of Laboratory Medicine (K-S.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to Hyo-Soo Kim, MD or Young-Bae Park, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea. E-mail hyosoo{at}snu.ac.kr

Background— The efficacy of intracoronary infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) has not been compared between patients with acute (AMI) versus old myocardial infarction (OMI). In addition, the potential risk of restenosis associated with G-CSF–based stem cell therapy has not been evaluated in the setting of drug eluting stent (DES) implantation.

Methods and Results— We randomly allocated 96 patients with myocardial infarction who underwent coronary revascularization with DES for the culprit lesion into 4 groups. Eighty-two patients completed 6-month follow-up; AMI cell infusion (n=25), AMI control (n=25), OMI cell infusion (n=16), and OMI control group (n=16). In cell infusion groups, PBSCs were mobilized by G-CSF for 3 days and delivered to infarcted myocardium via intracoronary infusion. The AMI cell infusion group showed a significant additive improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and remodeling compared with controls (change of LVEF: +5.1±9.1% versus –0.2±8.6%, P<0.05; change of end-systolic volume: –5.4±17.0 mL versus 6.5±21.9 mL, P<0.05). In OMI patients, however, there was no significant change of LVEF and ventricular remodeling in spite of significant improvement of coronary flow reserve after cell infusion. G-CSF–based cell therapy did not aggravate neointimal growth with DES implantation.

Conclusions— Intracoronary infusion of mobilized PBSCs with G-CSF improves LVEF and remodeling in patients with AMI but is less definite in patients with OMI. G-CSF–based stem cell therapy with DES implantation is both feasible and safe, eliminating any potential for restenosis.


Key Words: myocardial infarction • stem cell • G-CSF