Published online before print February 13, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.579987
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;113:953-959.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Heart Failure |
Biventricular Pacing Improves the Blunted Force–Frequency Relation Present During Univentricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Conduction Delay
From the Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr med Dirk Vollmann, Herzzentrum, Abteilung Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Klinikum der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. E-mail DirkVollmann2000{at}aol.com
Received August 3, 2005; revision received September 30, 2005; accepted October 11, 2005.
Background— In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and conduction delay, biventricular (BiV) and left ventricular (LV) pacing similarly improve systolic function at resting heart rates. We hypothesized that BiV and univentricular pacing differentially affect contractile function at increasing heart rates.
Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients (aged 66±2 years, QRS 179±8 ms, LV ejection fraction 23±1%) underwent cardiac catheterization before device implantation to measure LV hemodynamics at baseline (rate 68±2 bpm; sinus rhythm n=18; atrial fibrillation n=4) and during BiV, LV, and right ventricular (RV) stimulation at 80, 100, 120, and 140 bpm. BiV and LV pacing at 80 bpm equally augmented dP/dtmax as compared with baseline and RV pacing (P<0.001). Stimulation rate significantly interacted with the effect of BiV, LV, and RV pacing on LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), systolic pressure (LVSP), and dP/dtmax. Increasing the rate from 80 to 140 bpm enhanced dP/dtmax from 913±28 to 1119±50 mm Hg/s during BiV stimulation (P<0.001) but had no significant effect on contractility during single-site LV (951±47 versus 1002±54 mm Hg/s) or RV (800±46 versus 881±49 mm Hg/s) pacing. At 140 bpm, LVEDP was lower and LVSP higher during BiV pacing than during RV and LV pacing (LVEDP 12±1 versus 17±1 and 16±1 mm Hg, P<0.001; LVSP 112±5 versus 106±5 and 108±6 mm Hg, P<0.01 and P=0.09; BiV versus RV and LV pacing, respectively).
Conclusions— Different modes of ventricular stimulation alter the in vivo force–frequency relation of CHF patients. In contrast to single-site LV and RV pacing, contractile function improves with increasing heart rates during BiV stimulation. This effect may contribute to the enhanced exercise capacity during BiV pacing and could provide a functional benefit over LV-only pacing in patients for whom resynchronization therapy is indicated.
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  T. Hanke, M. Misfeld, M. Heringlake, J. J. Schreuder, U. K.H. Wiegand, and F. Eberhardt The effect of biventricular pacing on cardiac function after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with reduced left ventricular function: A pressure-volume loop analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2009; 138(1): 148 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. P. H.M. Delnoy, J. P. Ottervanger, H. O. Luttikhuis, D. H.S. Vos, A. Elvan, A. R. Ramdat Misier, W. P. Beukema, P. Steendijk, and N. M. van Hemel Pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation of biventricular pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy device to optimize right and left ventricular pacing sites Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2009; 30(7): 797 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Chakir, S. K. Daya, T. Aiba, R. S. Tunin, V. L. Dimaano, T. P. Abraham, K. Jaques, E. W. Lai, K. Pacak, W.-Z. Zhu, et al. Mechanisms of Enhanced {beta}-Adrenergic Reserve From Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Circulation, March 10, 2009; 119(9): 1231 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Luthje, B. Renner, R. Kessels, D. Vollmann, T. Raupach, B. Gerritse, S. Tasci, J. O. Schwab, M. Zabel, D. Zenker, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy and atrial overdrive pacing for the treatment of central sleep apnoea Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2009; 11(3): 273 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Butter and G. Hindricks Cardiac resynchronization therapy: haemodynamic background and perspectives Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I87 - I93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-R. Neuberger, C. Mewis, D. J. van Veldhuisen, U. Schotten, I. C. van Gelder, M. A. Allessie, and M. Bohm Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2568 - 2577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Sirker, M. Thomas, S. Baker, J. Shrimpton, S. Jewell, L. Lee, R. Rankin, V. Griffiths, N. Cooter, R. James, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: left or left-and-right for optimal symptomatic effect the LOLA ROSE study Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 862 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kurita, K. Onishi, K. Dohi, M. Tanabe, N. Fujimoto, T. Tanigawa, M. Setsuda, N. Isaka, T. Nobori, and M. Ito Impact of heart rate on mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular contractility in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2007; 9(6-7): 637 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Givertz, C. Andreou, C. H. Conrad, and W. S. Colucci Direct Myocardial Effects of Levosimendan in Humans With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Alteration of Force-Frequency and Relaxation-Frequency Relationships Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1218 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Kass Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Cardiac Reserve: How You Climb a Staircase May Alter Its Steepness Circulation, February 21, 2006; 113(7): 923 - 925. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|