This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lancellotti, P. Articles by Pierard, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lancellotti, P. Articles by Pierard, L. A. Related Collections Exercise testing Valvular heart disease Echocardiography CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2005;112:I-377 – I-382.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Prognostic Importance of Quantitative Exercise Doppler Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Patrizio Lancellotti, MD, PhD; Florence Lebois, MD; Marc Simon, MD; Christophe Tombeux, MD; Christophe Chauvel, MD; Luc A. Pierard, MD, PhD, FESC

From the Department of Cardiology (P.L., F.L., C.T., L.A.P.), University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium, and Clinique St Augustin (M.S., C.C.), Bordeaux, France.

Correspondence to Dr Luc A. Piérard or Patrizio Lancellotti, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Liège, B-4000 Liege, Belgium. E-mail: lpierard{at}chu.ulg.ac.be or plancellotti@chu.ulg.ac.be

Background— In patients with asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis, exercise testing may help to stratify the clinical risk. However, data are limited, and the role of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography has never been investigated.

Methods and Results— Sixty-nine consecutive patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm²) who prospectively underwent quantitative Doppler echocardiographic measurements at rest and during semisupine exercise test were followed up for 15±7 months. Of these, 26 had an abnormal response to exercise [occurrence of 1 of the following findings: angina, dyspnea, 2 mm ST segment depression, or fall or small (<20 mm Hg) rise in systolic blood pressure during the test] and 18 presented cardiac events during follow-up (symptoms in 2 patients, acute pulmonary edema in 2, aortic valve replacement in 12, and cardiac death in 2). In univariate analysis, patients who had cardiac events exhibited a higher increase in both peak (29±16 versus 22±14 mm Hg; P=0.019) and mean (23±8 versus 12±7 mm Hg; P=0.000003) transvalvular pressure gradients, whereas the left ventricular ejection fraction reached at peak stress was lower. These patients experienced more frequently symptoms during exercise (14 of 18 versus 12 of 51; P=0.0008). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of cardiac events were as follows: an increase in mean transaortic pressure gradient by 18 mm Hg during exercise (P=0.0015), an abnormal exercise test (P=0.0026), and an aortic valve area <0.75 cm² (P=0.0031). Exercise Doppler echocardiographic findings provided incremental prognostic value over resting echocardiographic and exercise electrocardiographic parameters.

Conclusions— Quantitative Doppler exercise echocardiography could be useful to identify a high-risk subset of patients with asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis and help for clinical decision making.

Key Words: aortic valve • echocardiography • exercise • prognosis