Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:3901-3910
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533372
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyseggen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyseggen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Animal models of human disease

(Circulation. 2005;112:3901-3910.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Imaging

Myocardial Strain Analysis in Acute Coronary Occlusion

A Tool to Assess Myocardial Viability and Reperfusion

Erik Lyseggen, MD; Helge Skulstad, MD; Thomas Helle-Valle, MD; Trond Vartdal, MD; Stig Urheim, MD, PhD; Stein Inge Rabben, PhD; Anders Opdahl, MD; Halfdan Ihlen, MD, PhD; Otto A. Smiseth, MD, PhD

From the Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Correspondence to Otto A. Smiseth, Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, N-0027 Oslo, Norway. E-mail o.a.smiseth{at}klinmed.uio.no

Received February 16, 2005; revision received September 19, 2005; accepted September 21, 2005.

Background— This study proposes 2 new echocardiographic indices with potential application in acute coronary artery occlusion to differentiate between viable and necrotic myocardium and to identify reperfusion. We investigated whether the ratio between systolic lengthening and combined late and postsystolic shortening (L-S ratio) could identify viable myocardium and whether systolic myocardial compliance, calculated as systolic lengthening divided by systolic pressure rise, could identify necrotic myocardium.

Methods and Results— In anesthetized dogs, we measured left ventricular (LV) pressure and long-axis strain by Doppler echocardiography (SDE) and sonomicrometry. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 15 minutes with 3-hour reperfusion (n=6), for 4 hours with 3-hour reperfusion (n=6), or for 4 hours with no reperfusion (n=6). Myocardial work was quantified by pressure–segment length analysis, necrosis by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, and edema by water content. L-S ratio and systolic compliance were calculated by SDE. The L-S ratio ranged between 0.00 and 1.00 and was well correlated with regional myocardial work (r=0.77, P<0.0001). In entirely passive myocardium, the L-S ratio approached 1 and was similar in viable (0.88±0.02) and necrotic (0.81±0.03) myocardium. Compliance, however, was reduced in necrotic myocardium owing to edema (0.07±0.01%/mm Hg) but was preserved in viable myocardium (0.15±0.01%/mm Hg, P<0.05). Reperfusion of viable myocardium caused a reduction of the L-S ratio after 15 minutes (0.57±0.06, P<0.05), reflecting recovery of function. Reperfusion of necrotic myocardium caused no change in the L-S ratio, but compliance was further reduced within 15 minutes (0.03±0.01%/mm Hg, P<0.05).

Conclusion— Myocardial L-S ratio and compliance by SDE identified active contraction and necrosis, respectively. These indices should be tested clinically for assessment of myocardial viability and reperfusion.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Bijnens, P. Claus, F. Weidemann, J. Strotmann, and G. R. Sutherland
Investigating Cardiac Function Using Motion and Deformation Analysis in the Setting of Coronary Artery Disease
Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2453 - 2464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Vartdal, H. Brunvand, E. Pettersen, H.-J. Smith, E. Lyseggen, T. Helle-Valle, H. Skulstad, H. Ihlen, and T. Edvardsen
Early Prediction of Infarct Size by Strain Doppler Echocardiography After Coronary Reperfusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 24, 2007; 49(16): 1715 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. Lucats, B. Ghaleh, X. Monnet, P. Colin, A. Bize, and A. Berdeaux
Conversion of post-systolic wall thickening into ejectional thickening by selective heart rate reduction during myocardial stunning
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2007; 28(7): 872 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. B. Ingul, E. Rozis, S. A. Slordahl, and T. H. Marwick
Incremental Value of Strain Rate Imaging to Wall Motion Analysis for Prediction of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography
Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1252 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Gorcsan III
Echocardiographic Strain Imaging for Myocardial Viability: An Improvement Over Visual Assessment?
Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3820 - 3822.
[Full Text] [PDF]