doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.578492
(Circulation. 2005;112:3445-3450.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology |
Comparison of Bare-Metal Stenting With Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery for Stenosis of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery
A 5-Year Follow-Up
From the University of Leipzig–Heart Center, Departments of Cardiology (H.T., S.O., R.H., P.S., G.S.) and Cardiac Surgery (S.J., J.F.G., F.W.M., V.F.), Leipzig, Germany.
Correspondence to Holger Thiele, MD, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig–Heart Center, Strümpellstr 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. E-mail thielh{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Received July 25, 2005; revision received August 29, 2005; accepted October 3, 2005.
Background— Randomized trials comparing stenting with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending lesions have shown a significantly higher reintervention rate for stenting and similar results for mortality and reinfarction at short-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up data are sparse.
Methods and Results— Patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending stenosis were randomized to either surgery (n=110) or bare-metal stenting (n=110). At 5 years, follow-up data were obtained with respect to the primary end point of death, reinfarction, or repeated target vessel revascularization. Clinical symptoms were assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification. Follow-up information was completed for 216 patients (98.2%), and mean follow-up was 5.6±1.2 years. With respect to mortality (surgery, 12%; stenting, 10%; P=0.54) and reinfarctions (surgery, 7%; stenting, 5%; P=0.46), there were no differences between treatment strategies. The need for repeated target vessel revascularization was significantly higher after stenting (32%) compared with surgery (10%; P<0.001). Clinical symptoms improved significantly in both treatment groups compared with baseline; however, there was a favorable trend for surgery (stenting: CCS, 2.6±0.9 to 0.5±0.8, P<0.001; surgery: CCS, 2.6±0.9 to 0.3±0.6, P<0.001; P=0.05, stenting versus surgery).
Conclusions— At the 5-year follow-up, minimally invasive bypass surgery and bare-metal stenting showed similar results for the end points of mortality and reinfarctions. However, the reintervention rate is higher after stenting, and the relief in clinical symptoms is slightly better after surgery.
Key Words: bypass • coronary disease • revascularization • stents • surgery
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. Thiele, P. Neumann-Schniedewind, S. Jacobs, E. Boudriot, T. Walther, F.-W. Mohr, G. Schuler, and V. Falk Randomized Comparison of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting in Isolated Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 23, 2009; 53(25): 2324 - 2331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Kapoor, A. L. Gienger, R. Ardehali, R. Varghese, M. V. Perez, V. Sundaram, K. M. McDonald, D. K. Owens, M. A. Hlatky, and D. M. Bravata Isolated Disease of the Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery: Comparing the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2008; 1(5): 483 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Falk and F. W. Mohr Minimally Invasive Myocardial Revascularization Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 697 - 710. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Bravata, A. L. Gienger, K. M. McDonald, V. Sundaram, M. V. Perez, R. Varghese, J. R. Kapoor, R. Ardehali, D. K. Owens, and M. A. Hlatky Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Ann Intern Med, November 20, 2007; 147(10): 703 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Jacobs, D. Holzhey, H. Stein, F. W. Mohr, and V. Falk Catheter-Based Endoscopic Bypass Grafting: An Experimental Feasibility Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1724 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Jaffery, M. Kowalski, W. D. Weaver, and S. Khanal A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 691 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Bainbridge, D. Cheng, J. Martin, R. Novick, and The Evidence-based Peri-operative Clinical Outcome Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 623 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Holzhey, S. Jacobs, M. Mochalski, T. Walther, H. Thiele, F. W. Mohr, and V. Falk Seven-Year Follow-up After Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass: Experience With More Than 1300 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Falk Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 628 - 629. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Stent or Operate on the Proximal LAD? Journal Watch Cardiology, January 19, 2006; 2006(119): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, December 10, 2005; 331(7529): 1416 - 1416. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|