Published online before print October 3, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.534164
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;112:2268-2275.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Health Services and Outcomes Research |
Effect of Cuts in Medicare Reimbursement on Process and Outcome of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients
From Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center (K.G.V.), and School of Medicine (K.G.V., J.Z.) and the Wharton School (K.G.V.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; University of Chicago (R.T.K.), Chicago, Ill; Ovation Research Group (L.P.), Seattle, Wash; and Duke University (E.P.), Durham, NC.
Correspondence to Kevin G. Volpp, MD, PhD, 1232 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021. E-mail volpp70{at}wharton.upenn.edu
Received January 6, 2005; revision received July 8, 2005; accepted July 22, 2005.
Background— The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 was designed to reduce Medicare reimbursements by $116.4 billion from 1998 to 2002. The objective of this study was to determine whether the process of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) worsened to a greater degree in hospitals under increased financial strain from the BBA and whether vulnerable populations such as the uninsured were disproportionately affected.
Methods and Results— We examined how process-of-care measures and in-hospital mortality for AMI patients changed in accordance with the degree of BBA-induced financial stress using data on 236 506 patients from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) and Medicare Cost Reports from 1996 to 2001. BBA-induced reductions in hospital net revenues were estimated at 1.5% ($2.9 million) for hospitals with low BBA impact and 3.2% ($3.7 million) for hospitals with a high impact in 1998, worsening to 2.2% ($4.4 million) and 4.7% ($6.0 million), respectively, by 2001. For both insured and uninsured patients in high- versus low-impact hospitals, there was no systematic worsening of time to thrombolytic therapy, balloon inflation, medication use on admission, medication use on discharge, or mortality. There was no systematic pattern of different treatment among the insured and uninsured. Operating margins decreased to a degree commensurate with the degree of revenue reduction in high- versus low-impact hospitals.
Conclusions— BBA created a moderate financial strain on hospitals. However, process-of-care measures for both insured and uninsured patients with AMI were not appreciably affected by these revenue reductions. It is important to note that these results apply only to AMI patients; we do not know the degree to which these findings generalize to other conditions.
Key Words: delivery of health care • health policy • outcome assessment (health care)
Related Article:
Circulation 2005 112: 2219.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. J. Bazzoli, J. P. Clement, R. C. Lindrooth, H.-F. Chen, S. K. Aydede, B. I. Braun, and J. M. Loeb Hospital Financial Condition and Operational Decisions Related to the Quality of Hospital Care Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2007; 64(2): 148 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|