Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;111:1121-1127
Published online before print February 21, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157159.39889.EC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
111/9/1121    most recent
01.CIR.0000157159.39889.ECv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2005;111:1121-1127.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension

Predictors of New-Onset Diastolic and Systolic Hypertension

The Framingham Heart Study

Stanley S. Franklin, MD; Jose R. Pio, BS; Nathan D. Wong, PhD; Martin G. Larson, ScD; Eric P. Leip, MS; Ramachandran S. Vasan, MD; Daniel Levy, MD

From the Heart Disease Prevention Program, University of California, Irvine (S.S.F., J.R.P., N.D.W.); the Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Mass (M.G.L., E.P.L., R.S.V., D.L.); and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (D.L.).

Correspondence to Stanley S. Franklin, MD, Heart Disease Prevention Program, C240 Medical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. E-mail ssfranklinmd{at}earthlink.net

Received July 17, 2004; revision received October 22, 2004; accepted December 20, 2004.

Background— Factors leading differentially to the development of isolated diastolic (IDH), systolic-diastolic (SDH), and isolated systolic (ISH) hypertension are poorly understood. We examined the relations of blood pressure (BP) and clinical risk factors to the new onset of the 3 forms of hypertension.

Methods and Results— Participants in the Framingham Heart Study were included if they had undergone 2 biennial examinations between 1953 and 1957 and were free of antihypertensive therapy and cardiovascular disease. Compared with optimal BP (SBP <120 and DBP <80 mm Hg), the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for developing new-onset IDH over the ensuing 10 years were 2.75 for normal BP, 3.29 for high-normal BP (both P<0.0001), 1.31 (P=0.40) for SDH, and 0.61 (P=0.36) for ISH. The HRs of developing new-onset SDH were 3.32, 7.96, 7.10, and 23.12 for the normal BP, high-normal BP, ISH, and IDH groups, respectively (all P<0.0001). The HRs of developing ISH were 3.26 for normal and 4.82 for high-normal BP (both P<0.0001), 1.39 (P=0.24) for IDH, and 1.69 (P<0.01) for SDH. Increased body mass index (BMI) during follow-up predicted new-onset IDH and SDH. Other predictors of IDH were younger age, male sex, and BMI at baseline. Predictors of ISH included older age, female sex, and increased BMI during follow-up.

Conclusion— Given the propensity for increased baseline BMI and weight gain to predict new-onset IDH and the high probability of IDH to transition to SDH, it is likely that IDH is not a benign condition. ISH arises more commonly from normal and high-normal BP than from "burned-out" diastolic hypertension.


Key Words: blood pressure • hypertension • aging • obesity • epidemiology


Related Article:

Natural History of Hypertension Subtypes
Paolo Verdecchia and Fabio Angeli
Circulation 2005 111: 1094-1096. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. M. Cruickshank
Beta-blockers and hypertension.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2105 - 2106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. A. Chirinos, S. S. Franklin, R. R. Townsend, and L. Raij
Body Mass Index and Hypertension Hemodynamic Subtypes in the Adult US Population
Arch Intern Med, March 23, 2009; 169(6): 580 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. S. Lund, P. Rossing, A. A. Vaag, J. R. Petrie, I. Muhlhauser, J. M. Cruickshank, R. R. Holman, D. R. Matthews, and H. A. W. Neil
Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes
N. Engl. J. Med., January 22, 2009; 360(4): 416 - 418.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, and E. Mannarino
Assessing Cardiovascular Risk: Should We Discard Diastolic Blood Pressure?
Circulation, January 20, 2009; 119(2): 210 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L.-T. Cheng, Y.-L. Gao, Y. Gu, L. Zhang, S.-H. Bi, W. Tang, and T. Wang
Stepwise increase in the prevalence of isolated systolic hypertension with the stages of chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 16, 2008; (2008) gfn383v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. G. Lakoski, D. M. Herrington, D. M. Siscovick, and S. B. Hulley
C-Reactive Protein Concentration and Incident Hypertension in Young Adults: The CARDIA Study.
Arch Intern Med, February 13, 2006; 166(3): 345 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Verdecchia and F. Angeli
Natural History of Hypertension Subtypes
Circulation, March 8, 2005; 111(9): 1094 - 1096.
[Full Text] [PDF]