This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hazinski, M. F. Articles by Lurie, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hazinski, M. F. Articles by Lurie, K. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs CPR and emergency cardiac care

(Circulation. 2005;111:3336-3340.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

AHA Science Advisory

Lay Rescuer Automated External Defibrillator ("Public Access Defibrillation") Programs

Lessons Learned From an International Multicenter Trial: Advisory Statement From the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Committee; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; and the Council on Clinical Cardiology

Mary F. Hazinski, RN, MSN; Ahamed H. Idris, MD; Richard E. Kerber, MD; Andrew Epstein, MD; Dianne Atkins, MD; Wanchun Tang, MD; Keith Lurie, MD

Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator (AED) programs may increase the number of people experiencing sudden cardiac arrest who receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), can reduce time to defibrillation, and may improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest. These programs require an organized and practiced response, with rescuers trained and equipped to recognize emergencies, activate the emergency medical services system, provide CPR, and provide defibrillation. To determine the effect of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs on survival and other outcomes after SCA, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association (AHA), and others funded a large prospective randomized trial. The results of this study were recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and support current AHA recommendations for lay rescuer AED programs and emphasis on planning, training, and practice of CPR and use of AEDs. The purpose of this statement is to highlight important findings of the Public Access Defibrillation Trial and summarize implications of these findings for healthcare providers, healthcare policy advocates, and the AHA training network.

Key Words: AHA Science Advisory • defibrillation • heart arrest • fibrillation • cardiopulmonary resuscitation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. H. Tofler and J. E. Muller Triggering of Acute Cardiovascular Disease and Potential Preventive Strategies Circulation, October 24, 2006; 114(17): 1863 - 1872. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Shah and W. H. Maisel Recalls and safety alerts affecting automated external defibrillators. JAMA, August 9, 2006; 296(6): 655 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. M. Estes III Automated external defibrillators--device reliability and clinical benefits. JAMA, August 9, 2006; 296(6): 700 - 702. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Part 5: Electrical Therapies: Automated External Defibrillators, Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Pacing Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-35 - IV-46. [Full Text] [PDF]