(Circulation. 2005;111:2850-2857.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Special Report |

From the International Epidemiology Institute (W.J.B.), Rockville, Md; Johns Hopkins University (M.A.I., R.B.), Baltimore, Md; the Cardiac Surgery Institute (T.D.I.), Cincinnati, Ohio; London, England (D.E.A.); Massachusetts General Hospital (A.W.), Boston, Mass; Saint Antonius Hospital (J.D.), Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Trustees Bowling-Pfizer Settlement Funds (J.K.S.), Cincinnati, Ohio; and the University of Cincinnati (D.H.), Cincinnati, Ohio.
Correspondence to William J. Blot, PhD, 1455 Research Blvd, Suite 550, Rockville, MD 20850. E-mail blotw{at}iei.ws
Received October 5, 2004; revision received January 4, 2005; accepted January 31, 2005.
Background The first Björk-Shiley convexoconcave (BSCC) prosthetic heart valves were implanted in 1978. The 25th anniversary provided a stimulus to summarize the research data relevant to BSCC valve fracture, patient management, and current clinical options.
Methods and Results Published and unpublished data on the risks of BSCC valve fracture and replacement were compiled, and strategies for identifying candidates for prophylactic valve reoperation were summarized. By December 2003, outlet strut fractures (OSFs), often with fatal outcomes, had been reported in 633 BSCC valves (0.7% of 86 000 valves implanted). Fractures still continue to occur, but average rates of OSFs in 60° valves are now <0.1% per year. OSF risk varies markedly by valve characteristics, especially valve angle and size, with weaker effects associated with other manufacturing variables. OSF risks are mildly lower among women than men but decline sharply with advancing age. The risks of valve replacement typically greatly exceed those of OSF. By comparing individualized estimated risks of OSF versus valve replacement, guidelines have been developed to identify the small percentage of BSCC patients (mostly younger men) who would be expected to have a gain in life expectancy should reoperative surgery be performed.
Conclusions Twenty-five years after the initial BSCC valve implants, fractures continue to occur. Continued monitoring of BSCC patients is needed to track and quantify risks and enable periodic updating of guidelines for patients and their physicians.
Key Words: valves prosthesis risk factors epidemiology surgery
Related Article:
Circulation 2005 111: 2717-2719.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. F. Padera Jr. and F. J. Schoen Pathology of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 111 - 178. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Jones The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 2094 - 2107. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Maisel Safety Issues Involving Medical Devices: Implications of Recent Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Malfunctions JAMA, August 24, 2005; 294(8): 955 - 958. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Blackstone Could It Happen Again?: The Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart Valve Story Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2717 - 2719. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |