Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:e568-e571
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000149077.87074.DE
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W.F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Circulation. 2004;110:e568-e571.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


AHA Conference Proceedings

CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease

Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Ability of Inflammatory Markers to Predict Disease in Asymptomatic Patients: A Background Paper

Peter W.F. Wilson, MD

Abstract

There is great interest in moving beyond established risk factors to consider markers of inflammation for the prediction of initial cardiovascular disease events. Inflammatory markers such as leukocyte count, serum amyloid A, C-reactive protein, and vascular outcomes in individuals free of cardiovascular disease at baseline are the key markers that have been investigated in the population setting. A meta-analysis of 11 prospective studies in asymptomatic individuals compared people in the bottom third of the C-reactive protein distribution with those in the top tertile. The authors reported an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.5) for coronary heart disease among people in the top tertile. These results are among the strongest assembled thus far to recommend incorporating newer biomarkers into coronary heart disease risk estimation algorithms. A variety of issues should be considered and conditions satisfied before vascular disease risk factors are adopted into regular use. The type of vascular event and the follow-up interval are important features because results for short-, intermediate-, and long-term intervals may yield different results. The factors under consideration should have been standardized, and characteristics such as the variability of the measurements, correlations with established factors, evidence from observational studies and clinical trials, type of effect (linear, nonlinear, dichotomous), improvement in overall prediction (discrimination), generalization of results (calibration), and cost can affect the utility. Each of these issues needs to be considered and the effects on relative, absolute, and population-attributable risks described. In particular, we need to (1) develop sound strategies for implementing new testing and (2) demonstrate the benefit of testing by using the current foundation of prior probabilities developed from already-published risk factor assessments based on large population studies.


Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements • inflammation • cardiovascular diseases • homocysteine • C-reactive protein




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Hernandez Madrid and C. Moro
Atrial Fibrillation and C-Reactive Protein: Searching for Local Inflammation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2007; 49(15): 1649 - 1650.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. Herder, M. Peltonen, W. Koenig, I. Kraft, S. Muller-Scholze, S. Martin, T. Lakka, P. Ilanne-Parikka, J. G. Eriksson, H. Hamalainen, et al.
Systemic Immune Mediators and Lifestyle Changes in the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.
Diabetes, August 1, 2006; 55(8): 2340 - 2346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Mora, N. Rifai, J. E. Buring, and P. M Ridker
Additive Value of Immunoassay-Measured Fibrinogen and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels for Predicting Incident Cardiovascular Events
Circulation, August 1, 2006; 114(5): 381 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Vasan
Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations
Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2335 - 2362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. A. Pearson, G. A. Mensah, Y. Hong, and S. C. Smith Jr
CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Overview
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): e543 - e544.
[Full Text] [PDF]