Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:IV-13-IV-19
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150640.98772.af
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leizorovicz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mismetti, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leizorovicz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mismetti, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Deep Vein Thrombosis
*Pulmonary Embolism
Hazardous Substances DB
*HEPARIN

(Circulation. 2004;110:IV-13 – IV-19.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism

Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients

Alain Leizorovicz, MD; Patrick Mismetti, MD, PhD

From the Unité de Pharmacologie Clinique, EA 3736, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, France; and the Unité de Pharmacologie Clinique, Université Saint Etienne, France.

Correspondence to Alain Leizorovicz, MD, Unité de Pharmacologie Clinique, EA 3736, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Rue Guillaume Paradin, 69376 Lyon Cedex 08, France. E-mail al{at}upcl.univ-lyon1.fr

Given the increased number of patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses and the associated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the use of prophylaxis has become a public health matter. Thromboprophylaxis is not widely practiced in acutely ill medical patients, due in part to the heterogeneity of this group and the perceived difficulty in assessing those who would most benefit from treatment. Nevertheless, the results of recent well-conducted clinical trials support the evidence-based recommendations for more widespread systematic use of low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) in this population. Three large well-controlled studies (MEDENOX, PREVENT, and ARTEMIS) in acutely ill medical patients confirm previous findings that different at-risk patient populations show a consistent 50% reduction in VTE events with LMWH and fondaparinux. A meta-analysis in nearly 5000 patients in internal medicine comparing UFH and LMWH revealed a trend for reduction of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with LMWH. Based on duration of use in clinical trials in acutely ill medical patients, prophylactic treatment with UFH and LMWH is recommended for 2 weeks.


Key Words: venous thromboembolism • thromboprophylaxis • unfractionated heparin • low-molecular-weight heparin • stroke • ICU • medical patients