Published online before print November 9, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000149236.92822.07
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;110:3636-3645.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Late-Breaking Clinical Trials |
Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS)
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Syncope Management
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (W.K.S., J.M.T., K.M.B., A.J., P.A.B., T.M.M., B.J.G., S.C.H., R.L.F.), the Department of Emergency Medicine (W.W.D., P.A.S., D.G.G., A.E.W.), and the Division of Biostatistics (D.O.H.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Reprint requests to Dr Win Shen, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail wshen{at}mayo.edu
Received October 7, 2004; revision received October 22, 2004; accepted October 22, 2004.
Background— The primary aim and central hypothesis of the study are that a designated syncope unit in the emergency department improves diagnostic yield and reduces hospital admission for patients with syncope who are at intermediate risk for an adverse cardiovascular outcome.
Methods and Results— In this prospective, randomized, single-center study, patients were randomly allocated to 2 treatment arms: syncope unit evaluation and standard care. The 2 groups were compared with 
2 test for independence of categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for continuous variables. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. One hundred three consecutive patients (53 women; mean age 64±17 years) entered the study. Fifty-one patients were randomized to the syncope unit. For the syncope unit and standard care patients, the presumptive diagnosis was established in 34 (67%) and 5 (10%) patients (P<0.001), respectively, hospital admission was required for 22 (43%) and 51 (98%) patients (P<0.001), and total patient-hospital days were reduced from 140 to 64. Actuarial survival was 97% and 90% (P=0.30), and survival free from recurrent syncope was 88% and 89% (P=0.72) at 2 years for the syncope unit and standard care groups, respectively.
Conclusions— The novel syncope unit designed for this study significantly improved diagnostic yield in the emergency department and reduced hospital admission and total length of hospital stay without affecting recurrent syncope and all-cause mortality among intermediate-risk patients. Observations from the present study provide benchmark data for improving patient care and effectively utilizing healthcare resources.
Key Words: syncope • diagnosis • prognosis
Related Article:
Circulation 2004 110: 3621-3623.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  Developed in collaboration with, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Failure Association (HFA), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Endorsed by the following societies, European Society of Emergency Medicine (EuSEM), European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM), European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), American Geriatrics Society (AGS), European Neurological Society (ENS), et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2009; 30(21): 2631 - 2671. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Sorajja, G. C. Nesbitt, D. O. Hodge, P. A. Low, S. C. Hammill, B. J. Gersh, and W.-K. Shen Syncope While Driving: Clinical Characteristics, Causes, and Prognosis Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11): 928 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. G. Benditt and J. T. Nguyen Syncope: therapeutic approaches. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 12, 2009; 53(19): 1741 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. McCarthy, C. G. McMahon, U. Geary, P. K. Plunkett, R. A. Kenny, and C. J. Cunningham Management of syncope in the Emergency Department: a single hospital observational case series based on the application of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 216 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Romero-Ortuno and R. A. Kenny Is it cardiac? Assessment of syncope with a scoring system Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1528 - 1529. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Y. Chen, D. G. Benditt, and W.-K. Shen Management of Syncope in Adults: An Update Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2008; 83(11): 1280 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Olshansky, J. E. Poole, G. Johnson, J. Anderson, A. S. Hellkamp, D. Packer, D. B. Mark, K. L. Lee, G. H. Bardy, and for the SCD-HeFT Investigators Syncope Predicts the Outcome of Cardiomyopathy Patients: Analysis of the SCD-HeFT Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2008; 51(13): 1277 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Ammirati, R. Colaceci, A. Cesario, S. Strano, A. Della Scala, I. Colangelo, T. De Santo, E. Toscano, R. Ricci, and M. Santini Management of syncope: clinical and economic impact of a Syncope Unit Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 471 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Costantino, F. Perego, F. Dipaola, M. Borella, A. Galli, G. Cantoni, S. Dell'Orto, S. Dassi, N. Filardo, P. G. Duca, et al. Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Syncope, Risk Factors, and Role of Hospital Admission: Results From the STePS (Short-Term Prognosis of Syncope) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 22, 2008; 51(3): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Brignole and W. K. Shen Syncope Management From Emergency Department to Hospital J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 22, 2008; 51(3): 284 - 287. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M J Reed and A Gray Collapse query cause: the management of adult syncope in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 589 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Brignole, A. Ungar, A. Bartoletti, I. Ponassi, A. Lagi, C. Mussi, M. A. Ribani, G. Tava, M. Disertori, F. Quartieri, et al. Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Europace, August 1, 2006; 8(8): 644 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bartoletti, P. Fabiani, P. Adriani, F. Baccetti, L. Bagnoli, G. Buffini, C. Cappelletti, P. Cecchini, R. Gianni, A. Lavacchi, et al. Hospital admission of patients referred to the Emergency Department for syncope: a single-hospital prospective study based on the application of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on syncope Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 83 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Brignole, C. Menozzi, A. Bartoletti, F. Giada, A. Lagi, A. Ungar, I. Ponassi, C. Mussi, R. Maggi, G. Re, et al. A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 76 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Lehman Evidently... Evid. Based Med., June 1, 2005; 10(3): 72 - 72. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., June 1, 2005; 10(3): 95 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Has the Time Come for Syncope Evaluation Units? Journal Watch Cardiology, February 4, 2005; 2005(204): 6 - 6. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Has the Time Come for Syncope Evaluation Units? Journal Watch (General), February 4, 2005; 2005(204): 5 - 5. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Patients with Undifferentiated Syncope May Not Require Admission Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, February 2, 2005; 2005(202): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. H. Maisel Specialized Syncope Evaluation Circulation, December 14, 2004; 110(24): 3621 - 3623. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|