Published online before print October 25, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147539.39775.F4
(Circulation. 2004;110:2851-2857.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Exercise Physiology |
Heart Rate Recovery and Impact of Myocardial Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality
From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.S.C., C.E.P., M.S.L.) and Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery (E.H.B.) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.H.B.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Correspondence to Michael S. Lauer, MD, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 9500 Euclid Ave, F25, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail lauerm{at}ccf.org
Received April 28, 2004; revision received August 27, 2004; accepted September 8, 2004.
Background— Although heart rate recovery (HRR) predicts mortality after exercise testing, its ability to identify patients likely to benefit after revascularization is unknown. We sought to determine whether HRR can identify patients likely to have improved survival after revascularization.
Methods and Results— A total of 8861 patients undergoing treadmill nuclear or echocardiographic testing were divided into early revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery within 3 months) and non–early revascularization groups. Prespecified subgroup analysis was performed based on the presence or absence of ischemia, normal or impaired functional capacity, and normal or abnormal HRR. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Early revascularization occurred in 552 patients. We propensity-matched 508 early revascularization patients to 508 non–early revascularization patients on the basis of 48 possible confounders. This constituted the present study cohort. During 8-year follow-up, 232 patients died. Overall, revascularization was associated with a slight but not significant decrease in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.03). A significant decrease in mortality after revascularization was present in patients with imaging evidence of stress-induced ischemia (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.87). Ischemic patients with normal HRR had significantly lower mortality with revascularization (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90), whereas ischemic patients with abnormal HRR did not (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29); however, the test for interaction between these 2 groups was not significant (P=0.34).
Conclusions— In patients with imaging evidence of myocardial ischemia, an abnormal HRR is associated with a nonsignificant trend toward blunting the survival improvement associated with early revascularization. HRR does not appear to identify patients likely to have a survival benefit.
Key Words: heart rate • ischemia • revascularization • exercise • mortality
Related Article:
Circulation 2004 110: 2778-2780.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. S. Lauer, C. E. Pothier, D. J. Magid, S. S. Smith, and M. W. Kattan An Externally Validated Model for Predicting Long-Term Survival after Exercise Treadmill Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease and a Normal Electrocardiogram Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 821 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Kligfield and M. S. Lauer Exercise Electrocardiogram Testing: Beyond the ST Segment Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2070 - 2082. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. Morise Heart Rate Recovery: Predictor of Risk Today and Target of Therapy Tomorrow? Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2778 - 2780. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|