Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:II-85-II-90
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138192.65015.45
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hung, J.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hung, J.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, R. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2004;110:II-85 – II-90.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Mechanism of Recurrent Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation After Annuloplasty

Continued LV Remodeling as a Moving Target

Judy Hung, MD; Lampros Papakostas, MD; Stephen A. Tahta, MD; Bruce G. Hardy, MD; Bruce A. Bollen, MD; Carlos M. Duran, MD PhD; Robert A. Levine, MD

From the Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory (J.H., L.P., R.A.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and the International Heart Institute of Montana and University of Montana (S.A.T., B.G.H., B.A.B., C.M.D.), Missoula.

Correspondence to Judy Hung, MD, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory-VBK 508, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail Jhung{at}partners.org

Background— Patients who undergo ring annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) often have persistent or recurrent MR. This may relate to persistent leaflet tethering from left ventricle (LV) dilatation that is not relieved by ring annuloplasty. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that recurrent MR in patients after ring annuloplasty relates to continued LV remodeling.

Methods and Results— Serial echoes were reviewed in 30 patients (aged 72±11 years) who showed recurrent MR late (47±27 months) versus early (3.8±5.8 months) after ring annuloplasty for ischemic MR during coronary artery bypass grafting without interval infarction. Patients with intrinsic mitral valve disease were excluded. Echocardiographic measures of MR (vena contracta and jet area/left atrial area) and LV remodeling (LV dimensions, volumes, and sphericity) were assessed at each stage. The degree of MR increased from mild to moderate, on average, from early to late postoperative stages, without significant change in LV ejection fraction. Changes in MR paralleled increases in LV volumes and sphericity index at end-systole and end-diastole. The only independent predictor of late postoperative MR was LV sphericity index at end-systole.

Conclusions— Recurrent MR late after ring annuloplasty is associated with continued LV remodeling, emphasizing its dynamic relation to the LV.


Key Words: mitral regurgitation • ring annuloplasty • left ventricle remodeling