Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:1467-1472
Published online before print September 7, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000141732.28175.2A
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/11/1467    most recent
01.CIR.0000141732.28175.2Av1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viles-Gonzalez, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badimon, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viles-Gonzalez, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badimon, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow CT and MRI

(Circulation. 2004;110:1467-1472.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

In Vivo 16-Slice, Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Experimental Atherosclerosis

Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathology

Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez, MD; Michael Poon, MD; Javier Sanz, MD; Teresa Rius, MD; Konstantin Nikolaou, MD; Zahi A. Fayad, PhD; Valentin Fuster, MD PhD; Juan J. Badimon, PhD

From the Cardiovascular Biology Research Laboratory (J.F.V.-G., J.J.B.) and the Cardiovascular Institute (J.F.V.-G., M.P., J.S., T.R., K.N., Z.A.F., V.F., J.J.B.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Dr Juan J. Badimon, Director, Cardiovascular Biology, Research Laboratory, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Pl, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029. E-mail juan.badimon{at}mssm.edu

Received June 6, 2004; revision received July 11, 2004; accepted July 21, 2004.

Background— Noninvasive imaging can detect early atherosclerotic disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), because of its excellent spatial resolution, is already established as a tool for plaque characterization. Sixteen-slice, multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) was recently introduced into the field of cardiac imaging, with promising results for noninvasive angiography. We compared the capabilities of MDCT and MRI for the assessment of noncalcified, atherosclerotic plaques.

Methods and Results— Six atherosclerotic rabbits underwent in vivo imaging by MDCT and 1.5-T MRI. MDCT parameters were 120 kV, 120 mA/s, collimation 12x0.75, and spatial resolution 0.6x0.6 mm. MRI parameters were as follows: for proton density, repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) 2300/5.6; for T2, TR/TE 2300/62; and for T1, TR/TE 800/5.6; slice thickness was 3 mm and spatial resolution, 0.3x0.3 mm. Blinded analysis of 3-mm axial reconstructions from MDCT and the carefully matched MRI images (182 sections) showed excellent agreement between both modalities. MDCT yielded a slightly larger lumen area, anteroposterior diameters, and lateral diameters, with no significant differences in total vessel area. The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, to detect noncalcified, atherosclerotic plaques were 89% and 77% for MDCT and 97% and 94% for MRI. Fibrous-rich and lipid-rich plaque could not be differentiated visually, although they showed different attenuation properties (116±27 vs 51±25 Hounsfield units, P<0.01).

Conclusions— Both techniques allow reliable detection of noncalcified, atherosclerotic plaques and accurate assessment of vessel areas and diameters. MDCT offers the additive value of a very short image acquisition time when compared with MRI. The subtle measurement differences found between modalities may be due to the better spatial resolution of MRI, which probably explains its superiority for tissue characterization.


Key Words: tomography • magnetic resonance imaging • atherosclerosis • vessels • coronary disease




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Ferencik, R. C. Chan, S. Achenbach, J. B. Lisauskas, S. L. Houser, U. Hoffmann, S. Abbara, R. C. Cury, B. E. Bouma, G. J. Tearney, et al.
Arterial Wall Imaging: Evaluation with 16-Section Multidetector CT in Blood Vessel Phantoms and ex Vivo Coronary Arteries
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 708 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. A.S. Cordeiro and J. A.C. Lima
Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by multidetector row computed tomography angiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C40 - C47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. M. Matter, M. T. Wyss, P. Meier, N. Spath, T. von Lukowicz, C. Lohmann, B. Weber, A. R. de Molina, J. C. Lacal, S. M. Ametamey, et al.
18F-Choline Images Murine Atherosclerotic Plaques Ex Vivo
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2006; 26(3): 584 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]