| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;109:2269-2272.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine (W.F.F., P.J.F., A.C.Y., P.G.Y.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (L.B.B., D.T.C., R.C.R.), Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif; Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands (W.A., N.H.J.P.); and Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium (B.D.B.).
Correspondence to William F. Fearon, MD, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5637. E-mail wfearon{at}stanford.edu
Received January 16, 2004; de novo received February 19, 2004; revision received March 23, 2004; accepted March 24, 2004.
Background The effect of epicardial artery stenosis on myocardial microvascular resistance remains controversial. Recruitable collateral flow, which may affect resistance, was not incorporated into previous measurements.
Methods and Results In an open-chest pig model, distal coronary pressure was measured with a pressure wire, and the apparent minimal microvascular resistance was calculated during peak hyperemia as pressure divided by flow, measured either with a flow probe around the coronary artery (Rmicro app) or with a novel thermodilution technique (apparent index of microcirculatory resistance [IMRapp]). These apparent resistances were compared with the actual Rmicro and IMR after the coronary wedge pressure and collateral flow were incorporated into the calculation. Measurements were made at baseline (no stenosis) and after creation of moderate and severe epicardial artery stenoses. In 6 pigs, 189 measurements of Rmicro and IMR were made under the various epicardial artery conditions. Without consideration of collateral flow, Rmicro app (0.43±0.12 to 0.46±0.10 to 0.51±0.11 mm Hg/mL per minute) and IMRapp (14±4 to 17±7 to 20±10 U) increased progressively and significantly with increasing epicardial artery stenosis (P<0.001 for both). With the incorporation of collateral flow, neither Rmicro nor IMR increased as a result of increasing epicardial artery stenosis.
Conclusions After collateral flow is taken into account, the minimum achievable microvascular resistance is not affected by increasing epicardial artery stenosis.
Key Words: microcirculation coronary disease
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. F. Fearon, M. Shah, M. Ng, T. Brinton, A. Wilson, J. A. Tremmel, I. Schnittger, D. P. Lee, R. H. Vagelos, P. J. Fitzgerald, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 560 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Aarnoudse, M. van't Veer, N. H.J. Pijls, J. ter Woorst, S. Vercauteren, P. Tonino, M. Geven, M. Rutten, E. van Hagen, B. de Bruyne, et al. Direct Volumetric Blood Flow Measurement in Coronary Arteries by Thermodilution J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 11, 2007; 50(24): 2294 - 2304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K.C. Ng, A. C. Yeung, and W. F. Fearon Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation: Superior Reproducibility and Less Hemodynamic Dependence of Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Compared With Coronary Flow Reserve Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2054 - 2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.E. Spaan, J. J. Piek, J. I.E. Hoffman, and M. Siebes Physiological Basis of Clinically Used Coronary Hemodynamic Indices Circulation, January 24, 2006; 113(3): 446 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |