Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:2269-2272
Published online before print May 10, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128669.99355.CB
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
109/19/2269    most recent
01.CIR.0000128669.99355.CBv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fearon, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yock, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fearon, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yock, P. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PAPAVERINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2004;109:2269-2272.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

Microvascular Resistance Is Not Influenced by Epicardial Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity

Experimental Validation

William F. Fearon, MD; Wilbert Aarnoudse, MD; Nico H.J. Pijls, MD, PhD; Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD; Leora B. Balsam, MD; David T. Cooke, MD; Robert C. Robbins, MD; Peter J. Fitzgerald, MD, PhD; Alan C. Yeung, MD; Paul G. Yock, MD

From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine (W.F.F., P.J.F., A.C.Y., P.G.Y.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (L.B.B., D.T.C., R.C.R.), Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif; Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands (W.A., N.H.J.P.); and Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium (B.D.B.).

Correspondence to William F. Fearon, MD, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5637. E-mail wfearon{at}stanford.edu

Received January 16, 2004; de novo received February 19, 2004; revision received March 23, 2004; accepted March 24, 2004.

Background— The effect of epicardial artery stenosis on myocardial microvascular resistance remains controversial. Recruitable collateral flow, which may affect resistance, was not incorporated into previous measurements.

Methods and Results— In an open-chest pig model, distal coronary pressure was measured with a pressure wire, and the apparent minimal microvascular resistance was calculated during peak hyperemia as pressure divided by flow, measured either with a flow probe around the coronary artery (Rmicro app) or with a novel thermodilution technique (apparent index of microcirculatory resistance [IMRapp]). These apparent resistances were compared with the actual Rmicro and IMR after the coronary wedge pressure and collateral flow were incorporated into the calculation. Measurements were made at baseline (no stenosis) and after creation of moderate and severe epicardial artery stenoses. In 6 pigs, 189 measurements of Rmicro and IMR were made under the various epicardial artery conditions. Without consideration of collateral flow, Rmicro app (0.43±0.12 to 0.46±0.10 to 0.51±0.11 mm Hg/mL per minute) and IMRapp (14±4 to 17±7 to 20±10 U) increased progressively and significantly with increasing epicardial artery stenosis (P<0.001 for both). With the incorporation of collateral flow, neither Rmicro nor IMR increased as a result of increasing epicardial artery stenosis.

Conclusions— After collateral flow is taken into account, the minimum achievable microvascular resistance is not affected by increasing epicardial artery stenosis.


Key Words: microcirculation • coronary disease




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. F. Fearon, M. Shah, M. Ng, T. Brinton, A. Wilson, J. A. Tremmel, I. Schnittger, D. P. Lee, R. H. Vagelos, P. J. Fitzgerald, et al.
Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 560 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. Aarnoudse, M. van't Veer, N. H.J. Pijls, J. ter Woorst, S. Vercauteren, P. Tonino, M. Geven, M. Rutten, E. van Hagen, B. de Bruyne, et al.
Direct Volumetric Blood Flow Measurement in Coronary Arteries by Thermodilution
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 11, 2007; 50(24): 2294 - 2304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. K.C. Ng, A. C. Yeung, and W. F. Fearon
Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation: Superior Reproducibility and Less Hemodynamic Dependence of Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Compared With Coronary Flow Reserve
Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2054 - 2061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. A.E. Spaan, J. J. Piek, J. I.E. Hoffman, and M. Siebes
Physiological Basis of Clinically Used Coronary Hemodynamic Indices
Circulation, January 24, 2006; 113(3): 446 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]