Published online before print March 15, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000125126.83579.1B
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;109:1472-1475.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System
Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation
From the Second Department of Medicine, Allgemeines Krankenhaus St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Correspondence to Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD, Allgemeines Krankenhaus St Georg, 2 Med. Abteilung (Kardiologie), Lohmühlenstrasse 5, 20099 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail sernst1708{at}aol.com
Received November 17, 2003; revision received February 5, 2004; accepted February 6, 2004.
Background— Catheters are typically stiff and incorporate a pull-wire mechanism to allow tip deflection. While standing at the patient’s side, the operator manually navigates the catheter in the heart using fluoroscopic guidance.
Methods and Results— A total of 42 patients (32 female; mean age, 55±15 years) underwent ablation of common-type (slow/fast) or uncommon-type (slow/slow) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with the use of the magnetic navigation system Niobe (Stereotaxis, Inc). It consists of 2 computer-controlled permanent magnets located on opposite sides of the patient, which create a steerable external magnetic field (0.08 T). A small magnet embedded in the catheter tip causes the catheter to align and to be steered by the external magnetic field. A motor drive advances or retracts the catheter, enabling complete remote navigation. Radiofrequency current was applied with the use of a remote-controlled 4-mm, solid-tip, magnetic navigation–enabled catheter (55°C, maximum 40 W, 60 seconds) in all patients. The investigators, who were situated in the control room, performed the ablation using a mean of 7.2±4.7 radiofrequency current applications (mean fluoroscopy time, 8.9±6.2 minutes; procedure duration, 145±43 minutes). Slow pathway ablation was achieved in 15 patients, whereas slow pathway modulation was the end point in the remaining patients. There were no complications.
Conclusions— The Niobe magnetic navigation system is a new platform technology allowing remote-controlled navigation of an ablation catheter. In conjunction with a motor drive unit, this system was used successfully to perform completely remote-controlled mapping and ablation in patients with AVNRT.
Key Words: catheter ablation • tachycardia, supraventricular • mapping
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. Schmidt, R. R. Tilz, K. Neven, K.R. Julian Chun, A. Furnkranz, and F. Ouyang Remote Robotic Navigation and Electroanatomical Mapping for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Considerations for Navigation and Impact on Procedural Outcome Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 120 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ernst The future of atrial fibrillation ablation: new technologies and indications: Atrial fibrillation Heart, January 15, 2009; 95(2): 158 - 163. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Schmidt, K. R. J. Chun, R. R. Tilz, B. Koektuerk, F. Ouyang, and K.-H. Kuck Remote navigation systems in electrophysiology Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii57 - iii61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Rivero-Ayerza, E. Jessurun, S. Ramcharitar, Y. van Belle, P. W. Serruys, and L. Jordaens Magnetically guided left ventricular lead implantation based on a virtual three-dimensional reconstructed image of the coronary sinus Europace, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 1042 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Saliba, V. Y. Reddy, O. Wazni, J. E. Cummings, J. D. Burkhardt, M. Haissaguerre, J. Kautzner, P. Peichl, P. Neuzil, V. Schibgilla, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 24, 2008; 51(25): 2407 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Minami, H. Chung, M. Kudo, S. Kitai, S. Takahashi, T. Inoue, K. Ueshima, and H. Shiozaki Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Virtual CT Sonography with Magnetic Navigation Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W335 - W341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mehta, D. T. Hart, B. S. Nagra, Z. Liu, and B. K. Kantharia Successful ablation of focal left atrial tachycardia using Stereotaxis NiobeTM remote magnetic navigation system Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 280 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Pappone and V. Santinelli Remote ablation of accessory pathways Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 422 - 422. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Di Biase, T. S. Fahmy, D. Patel, R. Bai, K. Civello, O. M. Wazni, M. Kanj, C. S. Elayi, C. K. Ching, M. Khan, et al. Remote Magnetic Navigation: Human Experience in Pulmonary Vein Ablation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 868 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Y. Reddy, P. Neuzil, Z. J. Malchano, R. Vijaykumar, R. Cury, S. Abbara, J. Weichet, C. D. McPherson, and J. N. Ruskin View-Synchronized Robotic Image-Guided Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Experimental Validation and Clinical Feasibility Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2705 - 2714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Aryana, A. d'Avila, E. K. Heist, T. Mela, J. P. Singh, J. N. Ruskin, and V. Y. Reddy Remote Magnetic Navigation to Guide Endocardial and Epicardial Catheter Mapping of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1191 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Pappone, G. Vicedomini, F. Manguso, F. Gugliotta, P. Mazzone, S. Gulletta, N. Sora, S. Sala, A. Marzi, G. Augello, et al. Robotic Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1390 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.S. Thornton, P. Janse, D.A.M.J. Theuns, M.F. Scholten, and L.J. Jordaens Magnetic navigation in AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia study: early results of ablation with one- and three-magnet catheters. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 225 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Lindsay Perspectives on the development of a magnetic navigation system for remote control of electrophysiology catheters. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 231 - 232. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Atmakuri, E. I. Lev, C. Alviar, E. Ibarra, A. E. Raizner, S. L. Solomon, and N. S. Kleiman Initial Experience With a Magnetic Navigation System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Artery Lesions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 515 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Beyar, L. Gruberg, D. Deleanu, A. Roguin, Y. Almagor, S. Cohen, G. Kumar, and T. Wenderow Remote-Control Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Concept, Validation, and First-in-Humans Pilot Clinical Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 296 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. W. Stone, N. J. Reifart, I. Moussa, A. Hoye, D. A. Cox, A. Colombo, D. S. Baim, P. S. Teirstein, B. H. Strauss, M. Selmon, et al. Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronically Occluded Coronary Arteries: A Consensus Document: Part II Circulation, October 18, 2005; 112(16): 2530 - 2537. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Geleijns and J. Wondergem X-ray imaging and the skin: radiation biology, patient dosimetry and observed effects Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 121 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|