| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:2198.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine (W.F.F., H.M.O.F., P.J.F., A.C.Y., P.G.Y.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (L.B.B., D.T.C., R.C.R.), Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Correspondence to William F. Fearon, MD, Stanford University Medical Center, H3554, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail wfearon{at}stanford.edu
Received August 12, 2003; revision received September 16, 2003; accepted September 18, 2003.
Background Thermodilution coronary flow reserve (CFRthermo) is a new technique for invasively measuring coronary flow reserve (CFR) with a coronary pressure wire and is based on the ability of the pressure transducer to also measure temperature changes. Whether CFRthermo correlates well enough with absolute flow-derived CFR (CFRflow) to replace Doppler wirederived CFR (CFRDoppler) remains unclear.
Methods and Results In an open-chest pig model, CFRthermo was measured in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery and compared with CFRDoppler and CFRflow, measured with an external flow probe placed around the LAD. In 9 pigs, CFR was measured simultaneously by all 3 means in the normal LAD and after creation of an epicardial LAD stenosis. To determine the added effect of microvascular disease, measurements of flow reserve were also performed after disruption of the coronary microcirculation with embolized microspheres. Intracoronary papaverine (20 mg) was used to induce hyperemia. In a total of 61 paired measurements, CFRthermo correlated strongly with the reference standard CFRflow (r=0.85, P<0.001). CFRDoppler correlated less well with CFRflow (r=0.72, P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a closer agreement between CFRthermo and CFRflow.
Conclusion CFRthermo correlates better with CFRflow than does CFRDoppler.
Key Words: blood flow coronary disease microcirculation pressure
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Goette, A. Bukowska, D. Dobrev, J. Pfeiffenberger, H. Morawietz, D. Strugala, I. Wiswedel, F.-W. Rohl, C. Wolke, S. Bergmann, et al. Acute atrial tachyarrhythmia induces angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated oxidative stress and microvascular flow abnormalities in the ventricles Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2009; 30(11): 1411 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Stangl, V. Witzel, G. Baumann, and K. Stangl Current diagnostic concepts to detect coronary artery disease in women Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 707 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Fearon, M. Shah, M. Ng, T. Brinton, A. Wilson, J. A. Tremmel, I. Schnittger, D. P. Lee, R. H. Vagelos, P. J. Fitzgerald, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 560 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Melikian, M. T. Kearney, M. R. Thomas, B. De Bruyne, A. M. Shah, and P. A. MacCarthy A simple thermodilution technique to assess coronary endothelium-dependent microvascular function in humans: validation and comparison with coronary flow reserve Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2188 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J.-W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, E. Eeckhout, W. F. Fearon, S. T. Higano, M. J. Lim, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1321 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K.C. Ng, A. C. Yeung, and W. F. Fearon Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation: Superior Reproducibility and Less Hemodynamic Dependence of Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Compared With Coronary Flow Reserve Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2054 - 2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Roy, R. K. Banerjee, L. H. Back, M. R. Back, S. Khoury, and R. W. Millard Delineating the guide-wire flow obstruction effect in assessment of fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H392 - H397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. MacCarthy, A. Berger, G. Manoharan, J. Bartunek, E. Barbato, W. Wijns, G. R. Heyndrickx, N. H.J. Pijls, and B. De Bruyne Pressure-derived measurement of coronary flow reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 18, 2005; 45(2): 216 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Fearon, W. Aarnoudse, N. H.J. Pijls, B. De Bruyne, L. B. Balsam, D. T. Cooke, R. C. Robbins, P. J. Fitzgerald, A. C. Yeung, and P. G. Yock Microvascular Resistance Is Not Influenced by Epicardial Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity: Experimental Validation Circulation, May 18, 2004; 109(19): 2269 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |