Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:II-335-II-340
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087903.75204.ad
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.

(Circulation. 2003;108:II-335.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Myocardial Protection and Vascular Biology

Inhibition of the Cardiac Angiogenic Response to Surgical FGF-2 Therapy in a Swine Endothelial Dysfunction Model

Marc Ruel, MD, MPH; Gui Fu Wu, PhD; Tanveer A. Khan, MD; Pierre Voisine, MD; Cesario Bianchi, MD, PhD; Jianyi Li, MD; Jian Li, MD, PhD; Roger J. Laham, MD; Frank W. Sellke, MD

From the Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.R.); and the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (M.R., T.A.K., P.V., C.B., Jianyi Li, F.W.S.) and the Division of Cardiology (G.F.W., Jian Li, R.J.L.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Correspondence to Frank W. Sellke, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis Street, LMOB 2A, Boston MA 02215. Phone: 617-632-8285, Fax: 617-632-8387, E-mail: fsellke{at}caregroup.harvard.edu

Background— Discrepancy exists between the potent effects of therapeutic angiogenesis in laboratory animals and the marginal results observed in patients with advanced coronary artery disease. In vitro and small animal data suggest that angiogenesis may depend on locally available nitric oxide (NO), but the impact of endothelial dysfunction on therapeutic angiogenesis in the myocardium has been unclear. We compared the effects of clinically applicable angiogenesis methods in swine in which endothelial dysfunction was experimentally induced to that observed in normal swine.

Methods and Results— Miniswine were fed either a regular (N=13) or hypercholesterolemic diet (N=13) for 20 weeks. Hypercholesterolemic swine showed coronary endothelial dysfunction on videomicroscopy. Animals from both groups received 100 µg of perivascular sustained-release fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 in the lateral myocardial territory, previously made ischemic by placement of an ameroid constrictor around the circumflex artery. After 4 weeks of FGF-2 therapy, lateral myocardial perfusion was significantly lower in hypercholesterolemic than in normocholesterolemic swine, both at rest and during pacing (0.44±0.04 versus 0.81±0.15 mL/min/g at rest, respectively; P=0.006; and 0.50±0.06 versus 0.71±0.10 mL/min/g during pacing; P=0.02). Hypercholesterolemic swine showed no net increase in perfusion from FGF-2 treatment. Endothelial cell density and FGF receptor-1 expression were significantly lower in the lateral territory of hypercholesterolemic versus normocholesterolemic animals.

Conclusions— The cardiac angiogenic response to FGF-2 treatment using clinically applicable methods was markedly inhibited in hypercholesterolemic swine with coronary endothelial dysfunction. These findings suggest that coronary endothelial dysfunction is major obstacle to the efficacy of clinical angiogenesis protocols and constitutes a target toward making angiogenesis more effective in patients with advanced coronary disease.


Key Words: angiogenesis • coronary disease • endothelium-derived factors