Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:545-551
Published online before print January 20, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000047212.94399.7E
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/4/545    most recent
01.CIR.0000047212.94399.7Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schiele, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bassand, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schiele, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bassand, J.-P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC

(Circulation. 2003;107:545.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Stent

Immediate and 6-Month Results of the Multicenter, Randomized Balloon Equivalent to Stent Study (BEST)

François Schiele, MD, PhD; Nicolas Meneveau, MD, PhD; Martine Gilard, MD; Jacques Boschat, MD; Philippe Commeau, MD; Liu Pin Ming, MD; Pradip Sewoke, MD; Marie-France Seronde, MD; Mariette Mercier, MD; Sanjiv Gupta, MD; Jean-Pierre Bassand, MD

From the University Hospital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France (F.S., N.M., L.P.M., P.S., M.-F.S., M.M., S.G., J.-P.B.); the Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, CHU Brest, France (M.G., J.B.); and CHP St Martin, Caen, France (P.C.).

Correspondence to François Schiele, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Jean-Minjoz, Boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon Cedex, France. E-mail francois.schiele{at}ufc-chu.univ-fcomte.fr

Background— Balloon angioplasty guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) makes it possible to choose the balloon size according to the true vessel diameter and to detect suboptimal results requiring subsequent stent implantation. The Balloon Equivalent to STent (BEST) study aimed to assess whether this strategy would give the same results as systematic stenting.

Methods and Results— A total of 132 of 254 patients were randomized to IVUS-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (aggressive PTCA), and 122 were randomized to stenting (stent group). We hypothesized that a difference of <8% in the 6-month angiographic restenosis rate (primary end point) could be considered noninferior. The aggressive PTCA procedure was longer and had a greater use of contrast medium than stenting. In the aggressive PTCA group, crossover to stent was needed in 58 patients (44%). At 6 months, 20 of 119 patients (16.8±6.7%) in the aggressive PTCA group and 21 of 116 patients (18.1±7.0%) in the stent group had restenosis. The difference was -1.3%, with an upper limit of 95% confidence interval of 7.1% (ie, less than the noninferiority boundary). The in-stent restenosis rate was higher in the stent group (15.5% versus 5%; P=0.02). The differences in minimum lumen diameter, lumen cross-section area, and 1-year event rate were not significant.

Conclusions— A strategy of IVUS-guided angioplasty with provisional stenting is feasible and safe. At the cost of a more complex procedure, it reduces the stent rate by half, with similar 6-month angiographic IVUS and clinical outcome compared with stent implantation.


Key Words: angioplasty • ultrasonics • stent • restenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al.
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. L. Orford, A. Lerman, and D. R. Holmes
Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention: A critical reappraisal
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1335 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]