Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:2894-2899
Published online before print June 9, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072770.27332.75
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/23/2894    most recent
01.CIR.0000072770.27332.75v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abidov, A.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abidov, A.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Disease in Women
*Heart Diseases
Related Collections
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET

(Circulation. 2003;107:2894.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Prognostic Impact of Hemodynamic Response to Adenosine in Patients Older Than Age 55 Years Undergoing Vasodilator Stress Myocardial Perfusion Study

Aiden Abidov, MD, PhD; Rory Hachamovitch, MD, MSc; Sean W. Hayes, MD; Chee Keong Ng, MD; Ishac Cohen, PhD; John D. Friedman, MD; Guido Germano, PhD; Daniel S. Berman, MD

From the Department of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (A.A., S.W.H., C.K.N., I.C., J.D.F., G.G., D.S.B.), and Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine (R.H.).

Correspondence to Daniel S. Berman, MD, Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Taper Building, Room 1258, Los Angeles, CA 90048. E-mail bermand{at}cshs.org

Background— The prognostic importance of various hemodynamic responses to adenosine infusion in patients undergoing adenosine stress myocardial perfusion stress (MPS) has not been defined.

Methods and Results— We identified 3444 unique patients (53.5% women, mean age 74.0±8.4 years) who underwent adenosine (with no additional exercise) stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) and were followed up for 2.0±0.8 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of hemodynamic variables in predicting cardiac death (CD). Two hundred twenty-four CDs (6.5%) occurred during follow-up. By multivariable analysis, higher rest heart rate (HR) and to a lesser extent lower peak HR were markers of CD. When added to the multivariable model in place of peak and rest HR, the peak/rest HR ratio was an independent predictor of CD. Peak/rest HR ratio additionally risk-stratified patients within each MPS category. A significant interaction was found between gender and peak systolic blood pressure (SBP), in which there was an increased risk associated with a low peak SBP (<90 mm Hg at end of adenosine infusion) in men but not in women.

Conclusions— Patients undergoing adenosine stress MPS with high rest HR and low peak/rest HR ratio have increased risk of CD, as do male patients with a low peak SBP. Assessment of the hemodynamic response to adenosine adds incremental prognostic value to MPS results and enhances identification of patients at risk for CD.


Key Words: adenosine • hemodynamics • prognosis • perfusion • imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
D. S. Berman, R. Hachamovitch, L. J. Shaw, J. D. Friedman, S. W. Hayes, L. E.J. Thomson, D. S. Fieno, G. Germano, N. D. Wong, X. Kang, et al.
Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Noninvasive Risk Stratification and a Conceptual Framework for the Selection of Noninvasive Imaging Tests in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1107 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Abidov, A. Rozanski, R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, F. Aboul-Enein, I. Cohen, J. D. Friedman, G. Germano, and D. S. Berman
Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing.
N. Engl. J. Med., November 3, 2005; 353(18): 1889 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons and P. A. Araoz
The year in cardiac imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 1937 - 1944.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Abidov, R. Hachamovitch, A. Rozanski, S. W. Hayes, M. M. Santos, M. G. Sciammarella, I. Cohen, J. Gerlach, J. D. Friedman, G. Germano, et al.
Prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1062 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]