Published online before print December 31, 2001, doi: 10.1161/hc0602.103584
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2002;105:680.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Cost-Effectiveness of a Conservative, Ischemia-Guided Management Strategy After Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction
Results of a Randomized Trial
From the VA Palo Alto Health Care System (P.G.B., S.C., B.C., P.W.L.), Palo Alto, Calif; Stanford University School of Medicine (P.G.B., P.W.L., M.A.H.), Stanford, Calif; Syracuse VA Medical Center (W.E.B.), Syracuse, NY; and VA Puget Sound Health Care System (N.R.E.), Seattle, Wash.
Correspondence to Mark A. Hlatky, MD, Stanford University School of Medicine, HRP Redwood Building, Room 150, Stanford, CA 94305-5405. E-mail hlatky{at}stanford.edu
Background— Use of coronary angiography after myocardial infarction has been controversial, with some physicians advocating routine use and others advocating selective use only after documentation of residual myocardial ischemia. The effects of these strategies on economic outcomes have not been established.
Methods and Results— We analyzed data from a randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in 17 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals that enrolled 876 clinically uncomplicated patients 24 to 72 hours after an acute non–Q-wave myocardial infarction. The routine invasive strategy included early coronary angiography with revascularization based on established guidelines. The conservative, ischemia-guided strategy included noninvasive testing with radionuclide ventriculography and exercise thallium scintigraphy, followed by coronary angiography in patients with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. We measured the cost of hospitalization and outpatient visits and tests during follow-up and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The conservative, ischemia-guided strategy had lower costs than the routine invasive strategy, both during the initial hospitalization ($14 733 versus $19 256, P<0.001) and after a mean follow-up of 1.9 years ($39 707 versus $41 893, P=0.04). The hazard ratio for death was 0.72 (confidence limits, 0.51 to 1.01) in the conservative strategy. The conservative strategy had lower costs and better outcomes in 76% of 1000 bootstrap replications, and a cost-effectiveness ratio below $50 000 per year of life added in 96% of replications.
Conclusions— A conservative, ischemia-guided strategy of selective coronary angiography and revascularization for patients who develop objective evidence of recurrent ischemia is more cost-effective than a strategy of routine coronary angiography after uncomplicated non–Q-wave myocardial infarction.
Key Words: cost-benefit analysis • myocardial infarction • angiography • tests
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul Cost, Effectiveness, and Cost-Effectiveness Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 49 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. T. Stroupe, D. A. Morrison, M. A. Hlatky, P. G. Barnett, L. Cao, C. Lyttle, D. M. Hynes, W. G. Henderson, and for the Investigators of Veterans Affairs Cooperat Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Revascularization of High-Risk Patients Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1251 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Elezi, A. Dibra, U. Folkerts, J. Mehilli, S. Heigl, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Cost Analysis From Two Randomized Trials of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 262 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J E Udelson and E J Flint Radionuclide imaging in risk assessment after acute coronary syndromes Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(suppl_5): v16 - v25. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Desideri, P. M. Fioretti, L. Cortigiani, D. Gregori, C. Coletta, C. Vigna, F. Tota, R. Rambaldi, J. Bax, L. Celegon, et al. Cost of strategies after myocardial infarction (COSTAMI): A multicentre, international, randomized trial for cost-effective discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2003; 24(18): 1630 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. W. Smith and G. J. Joseph Pharmacy Data in the VA Health Care System Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2003; 60(3_suppl): 92S - 123S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. G. Barnett Determination of VA Health Care Costs Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2003; 60(3_suppl): 124S - 141S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Barrabes, J. Figueras, C. Moure, J. Cortadellas, and J. Soler-Soler Prognostic Value of Lead aVR in Patients With a First Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, August 19, 2003; 108(7): 814 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P J Sheridan and D C Crossman Critical review of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2002; 78(926): 717 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Mahoney, C. T. Jurkovitz, H. Chu, E. R. Becker, S. Culler, A. S. Kosinski, D. H. Robertson, C. Alexander, S. Nag, J. R. Cook, et al. Cost and Cost-effectiveness of an Early Invasive vs Conservative Strategy for the Treatment of Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction JAMA, October 16, 2002; 288(15): 1851 - 1858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Conservative Strategy More Cost-Effective After NQWMI? Journal Watch Cardiology, May 3, 2002; 2002(503): 6 - 6. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Cost-Effective Management of Non-Q-Wave MI Journal Watch (General), March 26, 2002; 2002(326): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Mark and T. H. Lee Conservative Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Cheaper and Better for You? Circulation, February 12, 2002; 105(6): 666 - 668. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|