This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Palka, P. Articles by O’Brien, M. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Palka, P. Articles by O’Brien, M. F. Related Collections Valvular heart disease Echocardiography CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2002;105:61.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Primary Aortic Valve Replacement With Cryopreserved Aortic Allograft

An Echocardiographic Follow-Up Study of 570 Patients

Przemysaw Palka, MD; Susan Harrocks, BN; Aleksandra Lange, MD; Darryl J. Burstow, MBBS, FRACP; Mark F. O’Brien, FRACS

From the Departments of Echocardiography (P.P., A.L., D.J.B.) and Cardiac Surgery (S.H., M.F.O.), the Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Correspondence to Dr P. Palka, Department of Echocardiography, The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Brisbane Qld-4032, Australia. E-mail ppalka{at}hotmail.com

Background— Despite the many advantages of an aortic allograft valve (AAV) over a prosthetic aortic valve, its durability is suboptimal. The aims of the present study were to document characteristic features of AAV dysfunction and to investigate factors influencing the development of such dysfunction.

Methods and Results— A group of 570 patients (mean age, 48±16 years) with a cryopreserved AAV underwent a follow-up echocardiographic study (mean time after surgery, 6.8 years; range, 1.0 to 22.9 years). Significant AAV regurgitation was present in 14.7% of patients, and AAV stenosis was present in 3.2%. The root replacement subgroup had the smallest number of patients with significant AAV regurgitation (5.0%) compared with the subcoronary (23.0%) or the inclusion cylinder technique subgroup (14.7%). After 10 to 15 years after AAV replacement, grade 2 AAV dysfunction was present in 40% of patients in the subcoronary subgroup, but no significant dysfunction was observed in patients in the root replacement subgroup (P<0.001). Smaller host aortic annulus size in both subcoronary (coefficient, -0.145; P=0.013) and root replacement subgroups (coefficient, -0.249; P=0.011) was associated with more frequent AAV dysfunction (grade 2). In addition, significant AAV dysfunction was more frequent when patients were younger (coefficient, -0.020; P=0.015) in the subcoronary subgroup and the donor was older (coefficient, 0.054; P=0.019) in the root replacement subgroup.

Conclusions— The present study indicates that the root replacement technique is associated with less frequent AAV degeneration. Our findings should help in establishing more strict selection criteria for surgical replacement procedure type and patient/donor factors for AAV replacement and, therefore, could lead to improve AAV longevity.

Key Words: heart diseases • echocardiography • surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. H. Kincaid Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1144 - 1145. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Stelzer Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Porcine and Pericardial Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 915 - 934. [Full Text]

				H. J. Geissler, U. M. Fischer, S. Foerster, A. Krahwinkel, A. Antonyan, A. Kroener, K. Addicks, U. Mehlhorn, and W. Bloch Effect of Thawing on Nitric Oxide Synthase III and Apoptotic Markers in Cryopreserved Human Allografts Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1742 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 558 - 564.e4.

				J.-M. Grinda, J.-L. Mainardi, N. D'Attellis, M.-O. Bricourt, A. Berrebi, J.-N. Fabiani, and A. Deloche Cryopreserved Aortic Viable Homograft for Active Aortic Endocarditis Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 767 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Pompilio, G. Polvani, G. Piccolo, A. Guarino, A. Nocco, A. Innocente, M. Porqueddu, L. Dainese, F. Veglia, A. Sala, et al. Six-year monitoring of the donor-specific immune response to cryopreserved aortic allograft valves: Implications with valve dysfunction Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 557 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Rahimtoola The year in valvular heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 491 - 504. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Rahimtoola Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 893 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]