doi: 10.1161/hc2601.091710
(Circulation. 2001;104:58.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Accurate Assessment of Patient Effective Radiation Dose and Associated Detriment Risk From Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Procedures
From the University of Crete, Faculty of Medicine, Iraklion, Crete, Greece.
Background—Radiofrequency (RF) cardiac catheter ablation procedures may require extended fluoroscopic exposure resulting in elevated radiation risk. The aim of the present study was to accurately establish RF ablation radiation risk levels and to provide means for accurate patient risk estimation from studies performed in any electrophysiology laboratory.
Methods and Results—Fluoroscopy required during cardiac ablation was classified into 4 types identified by beam orientation and irradiated tissue: (1) posteroanterior exposure during catheter advancing from the groin to the heart, (2) posteroanterior heart exposure, (3) left anterior oblique heart exposure, and (4) right anterior oblique heart exposure. The duration of each exposure was monitored in 24 patients undergoing RF cardiac ablation. Dose per minute of fluoroscopy was measured at 15 organs/tissues for each projection with the use of anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry. The effective dose rate was 219, 144, 136, and 112 µGy/min for groin-to-heart posteroanterior, posteroanterior, left anterior oblique, and right anterior oblique exposure, respectively. A typical ablation procedure results in a total effective dose of 8.3 mSv per hour of fluoroscopy. The average excess of fatal cancers was estimated to be 650 and 480 per million patients undergoing RF ablation requiring 1 hour of fluoroscopy for US and UK populations, respectively. The average risk for genetic defects was determined to be 1 per million births.
Conclusions—Radiation risk from RF cardiac ablation is moderate compared with other complications, but it may highly exceed radiation risk from common radiological procedures. Efforts should be made toward minimization of patient radiation risk from RF ablation procedures.
Key Words: catheter ablation • radiography • electrophysiology • risk factors
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. Fazel, H. M. Krumholz, Y. Wang, J. S. Ross, J. Chen, H. H. Ting, N. D. Shah, K. Nasir, A. J. Einstein, and B. K. Nallamothu Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures N. Engl. J. Med., August 27, 2009; 361(9): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N Theocharopoulos, J Damilakis, K Perisinakis, E Manios, P Vardas, and N Gourtsoyiannis Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): 644 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. P. Efstathopoulos, D. G. Katritsis, S. Kottou, N. Kalivas, E. Tzanalaridou, E. Giazitzoglou, S. Korovesis, and K. Faulkner Patient and staff radiation dosimetry during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures: a comprehensive analysis Europace, June 1, 2006; 8(6): 443 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Earley, R. Showkathali, M. Alzetani, P. M. Kistler, D. Gupta, D. J. Abrams, J. A. Horrocks, S. J. Harris, S. C. Sporton, and R. J. Schilling Radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias guided by non-fluoroscopic catheter location: a prospective randomized trial Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1223 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Padovani and E. Quai Patient dosimetry approaches in interventional cardiology and literature dose data review Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 217 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Trianni, G. Chizzola, H. Toh, E. Quai, E. Cragnolini, G. Bernardi, A. Proclemer, and R. Padovani Patient skin dosimetry in haemodynamic and electrophysiology interventional cardiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 241 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Lickfett, M. Mahesh, C. Vasamreddy, D. Bradley, V. Jayam, Z. Eldadah, T. Dickfeld, D. Kearney, D. Dalal, B. Luderitz, et al. Radiation Exposure During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 3003 - 3010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Perisinakis, J. Damilakis, N. Theocharopoulos, G. Papadokostakis, A. Hadjipavlou, and N. Gourtsoyiannis Patient Exposure and Associated Radiation Risks from Fluoroscopically Guided Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 701 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Schalla, M. Saeed, C. B. Higgins, A. Martin, O. Weber, and P. Moore Magnetic Resonance-Guided Cardiac Catheterization in a Swine Model of Atrial Septal Defect Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1865 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. J Schilling Which patient should be referred to an electrophysiologist: supraventricular tachycardia Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 299 - 304. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|