This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, H. Articles by Boyett, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, H. Articles by Boyett, M. R. Related Collections Structure Quantitative modeling

(Circulation. 2001;103:584.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Basic Science Reports

Gradient Model Versus Mosaic Model of the Sinoatrial Node

H. Zhang, PhD; A. V. Holden, PhD; M. R. Boyett, PhD

From the School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Correspondence to Professor M.R. Boyett, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. E-mail m.r.boyett{at}leeds.ac.uk

Background—A radical reinterpretation (mosaic model) of the makeup of the sinoatrial (SA) node has been proposed to explain the characteristic regional differences in electrical activity between the periphery and center of the SA node. According to the mosaic model, the differences result from a change in the mix of atrial cells and uniform SA node cells from periphery to center, whereas according to the alternative gradient model, there are no atrial cells within the functional SA node, and the differences result from a change in the intrinsic properties of SA node cells from periphery to center.

Methods and Results—A mosaic model of peripheral and central tissue has been constructed computationally by use of a coupled ordinary differential equation network (CODE) in a 2D lattice (20x20), with each node of the lattice designated randomly as an atrial cell or SA node cell (in correct proportions for periphery and center). The mosaic model fails to predict the characteristic differences in action potential rate and shape between the periphery and center, whereas the existing gradient model can do so.

Conclusions—The mosaic model of the SA node is untenable, and the SA node is adequately described by the gradient model.

Key Words: pacemakers • sinoatrial node • modeling

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Lei, H. Zhang, A. A. Grace, and C. L.-H. Huang SCN5A and sinoatrial node pacemaker function Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2007; 74(3): 356 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Jones, M. R. Boyett, and M. K. Lancaster Declining Into Failure: The Age-Dependent Loss of the L-Type Calcium Channel Within the Sinoatrial Node Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1183 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Musa, M. Lei, H. Honjo, S. A. Jones, H. Dobrzynski, M. K. Lancaster, Y. Takagishi, Z. Henderson, I. Kodama, and M. R. Boyett Heterogeneous Expression of Ca2+ Handling Proteins in Rabbit Sinoatrial Node J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2002; 50(3): 311 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Honjo, M. R Boyett, S. R Coppen, Y. Takagishi, T. Opthof, N. J Severs, and I. Kodama Heterogeneous expression of connexins in rabbit sinoatrial node cells: correlation between connexin isotype and cell size Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 89 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Verheijck, R. Wilders, and L. N. Bouman Atrio-Sinus Interaction Demonstrated by Blockade of the Rapid Delayed Rectifier Current Circulation, February 19, 2002; 105(7): 880 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]