This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Daoud, E. G. Articles by Strickberger, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Daoud, E. G. Articles by Strickberger, S. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Surgery Related Collections Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs Pacemaker

(Circulation. 2000;102:761.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Simultaneous Right and Left Atrial Epicardial Pacing for Prevention of Post–Open Heart Surgery Atrial Fibrillation

Emile G. Daoud, MD; Reza Dabir, MD; Michelle Archambeau, RN; Fred Morady, MD; S. Adam Strickberger, MD

From the Divisions of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, and Oakwood Hospital, Dearborn, Mich (E.G.D., M.A., F.M., S.A.S.), and the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oakwood Hospital, Dearborn, Mich (R.D.).

Correspondence to Emile Daoud, MD, 3545 Olentangy River Rd, Room 325, Columbus, OH 43214. E-mail egd{at}mocc.cc

Background—The purpose of this study was to assess simultaneous right and left atrial pacing as prophylaxis for postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Methods and Results—In a double-blind, randomized fashion, 118 patients who underwent open heart surgery were assigned to right atrial pacing at 45 bpm (RA-AAI; n=39), right atrial triggered pacing at a rate of 85 bpm (RA-AAT; n=38), or simultaneous right and left atrial triggered pacing at a rate of 85 bpm (Bi-AAT; n=41). Holter monitoring was performed for 4.8±1.4 days after surgery to assess for episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting >5 minutes. The prevalence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly less in the patients randomized to biatrial AAT pacing when compared with the other 2 pacing regimens (P=0.02). An episode of atrial fibrillation occurred in 4 (10%) of 41 patients in the Bi-AAT group compared with 11 (28%) of 39 patients in the RA-AAI group (P=0.03 versus Bi-AAT) and 12 (32%) of 38 patients in the RA-AAT group (P=0.01 versus Bi-AAT). There was no difference in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation between the right atrial AAI and AAT groups (P=0.8). There was no significant difference among the 3 groups with regard to the number of postoperative hospital days (7.3±4.2 days), morbidity (5.1%), or mortality rate (2.5%).

Conclusions—Simultaneous right and left atrial triggered pacing is well tolerated and significantly reduces the prevalence of post–open heart surgery atrial fibrillation.

Key Words: valves • bypass • surgery • arrhythmia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. W. Hogue Jr., L. L. Creswell, D. D. Gutterman, and L. A. Fleisher Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Risks: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 9S - 16S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. Maisel and A. E. Epstein The Role of Cardiac Pacing: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 36S - 38S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. McKeown and A. E. Epstein Future Directions: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 61S - 64S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Doi, M. Takagi, I. Toda, M. Yoshiyama, K. Takeuchi, and J. Yoshikawa Acute Hemodynamic Benefits of Bi-Atrial Atrioventricular Sequential Pacing With the Optimal Atrioventricular Delay J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 320 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kailasam, C. A. Palin, and C. W. Hogue Jr Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach to Prevention Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 77 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Ronald and J. Dunning Bi-atrial pacing significantly reduces the Incidence of atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2005; 4(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hakala, A. J.M. Valtola, A. K. Turpeinen, A. E. Hedman, R. E.U. Vuorenniemi, J. M. Karjalainen, I. S. Vajanto, J. Kouri, P. A. Jaakkola, and J. E.K. Hartikainen Right atrial overdrive pacing does not prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(2): 170 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Takagi, A Doi, N Shirai, K Hirata, Y Takemoto, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Doi, M Takagi, I Toda, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute haemodynamic benefits of biatrial atrioventricular sequential pacing: comparison with single atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 411 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R A Archbold and R J Schilling Atrial pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review of the literature Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 129 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-K. Au, S.-W. Chiu, M.-P. Sun, L.-C. Cheung, and L.-C. Cheng Biatrial Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2003; 11(3): 222 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J.F. M. Bechtel, J. F. Christiansen, H.-H. Sievers, and C. Bartels Low-energy cardioversion versus medical treatment for the termination of atrial fibrillation after CABG Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1185 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A D Taylor, J G Groen, S L Thorn, C T Lewis, and A J Marshall New insights into onset mechanisms of atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass graft surgery Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(5): 499 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Crystal, S. J. Connolly, K. Sleik, T. J. Ginger, and S. Yusuf Interventions on Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Heart Surgery: A Meta-Analysis Circulation, July 2, 2002; 106(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Cooper, M. S. Katcher, and M. V. Orlov Implantable Devices for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., June 27, 2002; 346(26): 2062 - 2068. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Goette, G. Juenemann, B. Peters, H. U. Klein, A. Roessner, C. Huth, and C. Rocken Determinants and consequences of atrial fibrosis in patients undergoing open heart surgery Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]