Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:1802-1806

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuperstein, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sasson, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuperstein, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sasson, Z.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATENOLOL
*GLUCOSE
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
*Nutrition
*Obesity
Related Collections
Right arrow Obesity
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Echocardiography

(Circulation. 2000;102:1802.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on Glucose and Insulin Metabolism and on Left Ventricular Mass

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of 21 Obese Hypertensives

Rafael Kuperstein, MD; Zion Sasson, MD, FRCP(C)

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Correspondence to Zion Sasson, MD, FRCP(C), Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave #1602, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada. E-mail zsasson{at}mtsinai.on.ca

Background—Glucose and insulin levels are associated with left ventricular mass (LVM) in insulin-resistant individuals. Antihypertensive drugs have different effects on glucose and insulin metabolism (GIM) and on LVM. To evaluate whether the effects of antihypertensive therapy on LVM are associated with its effects on GIM, we compared the effects of atenolol and perindopril on these parameters in a group of insulin-resistant, obese hypertensives.

Methods and Results—A total of 21 obese, nondiabetic hypertensives who were aged 55±12 years, had a body mass index of 32.8±5.0 kg/m2, were free of coronary or valvular heart disease, and had normal LV function were randomized to treatment with atenolol (n=11) or perindopril (n=10). Echocardiographic LVM corrected for height (LVM/height) and GIM (3-hour intravenous glucose tolerance test) were measured after 4 to 6 weeks of washout and 6 months of treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Atenolol and perindopril effectively reduced blood pressure (from 149±13/98±4 to 127±8/82±6 mm Hg and from 148±9/98±4 to 129±9/82±6 mm Hg, respectively, for the atenolol and perindopril groups; P=0.002). Atenolol significantly worsened GIM parameters, fasting glucose levels (5.3±0.9 to 6.0±1.5 mmol/L; P=0.003), fasting insulin levels (121±121 to 189±228 pmol/L; P=0.03), and most other relevant metabolic measures (P<0.05 for all). Perindopril did not affect GIM. Atenolol did not affect LVM/height (119±12 to 120±17 g/m; P=0.8), whereas perindopril significantly reduced LVM/height (120±13 to 111±19 g/m; P=0.04).

Conclusions—In obese, hypertensive individuals, adequate and similar blood pressure control was achieved with perindopril and atenolol. However, perindopril but not atenolol was associated with a more favorable GIM profile and led to a significant regression of LVM.


Key Words: obesity • hypertension • insulin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Tenenbaum, E. Z. Fisman, V. Boyko, M. Benderly, D. Tanne, M. Haim, Z. Matas, M. Motro, and S. Behar
Attenuation of progression of insulin resistance in patients with coronary artery disease by bezafibrate.
Arch Intern Med, April 10, 2006; 166(7): 737 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. S. Daskalopoulou, D. P. Mikhailidis, and M. Elisaf
Prevention and Treatment of the Metabolic Syndrome
Angiology, November 1, 2004; 55(6): 589 - 612.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. L. Watkins, A. Sherwood, M. Feinglos, A. Hinderliter, M. Babyak, E. Gullette, R. Waugh, and J. A. Blumenthal
Effects of Exercise and Weight Loss on Cardiac Risk Factors Associated With Syndrome X
Arch Intern Med, September 8, 2003; 163(16): 1889 - 1895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
E. Rizos, E. Bairaktari, A. Kostoula, G. Hasiotis, A. Achimastos, E. Ganotakis, M. Elisaf, and D. P. Mikhailidis
The Combination of Nebivolol plus Pravastatin is Associated with a More Beneficial Metabolic Profile Compared to that of Atenolol plus Pravastatin in Hypertensive Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Pilot Study
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 1, 2003; 8(2): 127 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Y.H. Lip
Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Improved Prognosis: Some HOPE Now...or Hype?
Circulation, October 2, 2001; 104(14): 1582 - 1584.
[Full Text] [PDF]