This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shandas, R. Articles by Valdes-Cruz, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shandas, R. Articles by Valdes-Cruz, L. Related Collections Echocardiography CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2000;101:1953.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

A Method for Determining the Reference Effective Flow Areas for Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses

In Vitro Validation Studies

Robin Shandas, PhD; Jeffrey Kwon, MSEE; Lilliam Valdes-Cruz, MD

From The Children’s Hospital, Denver, Colo.

Correspondence to Robin Shandas, PhD, Cardiovascular Flow Research Laboratory, The Children’s Hospital, 1056 E 19th. Ave, B-100, Denver, CO 80218. E-mail Shandas.Robin{at}tchden.org

Background—The anatomic opening area (AOA) is usually reported as the primary index of mechanical heart valve function. Because flow contracts immediately distal to an orifice as a result of the vena contracta effect, AOA may not be a good measure of true effective flow area.

Methods and Results—Laser flow imaging was used to visualize the contraction in the jet flow stream as it passed through bileaflet mechanical valves under steady and pulsatile conditions. Such visualization allowed clear measurement of the individual vena contracta areas (VCAs) of the 3 valve orifices. VCAs for side orifices were larger (94±2% of AOA) than those through the central orifice (34±8%). Formation of large radial vortices around the leaflet tips constricted the central orifice flow stream and appeared to be the main reason for smaller central VCA. Total VCA remained constant until 0.5 orifice diameters (1.0 cm) downstream, beyond which cross-sectional area increased as a result of entrainment of receiving chamber flow. Total VCA was larger for steady flow (89.6±2.7% of AOA) than for pulsatile flow (76.3±5.0% of AOA).

Conclusions—This study further clarifies flow dynamics through bileaflet mechanical valves and provides previously unavailable reference information on VCAs for these valves. Such information should aid clinicians in explaining Doppler-derived and catheter-measured pressure discrepancies, validating clinical techniques for quantifying effective flow areas, and optimizing valve size for implantation. The method should also be useful for comparative studies of different valve designs.

Key Words: blood flow • valves • echocardiography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Haaverstad, N. Vitale, A. Karevold, G. Cappabianca, A. Tromsdal, P. S. Olsen, L. Kober, H. Ihlen, K. A. Rein, and J. L Svennevig Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 500 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 131 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 14, 2005; (2005) j.jacc.2005.05.100v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, I. Wallentin, P. Ask, and B. Wranne Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: An in vivo and in vitro study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]