Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:1282-1287

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mittal, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mittal, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, B. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery

(Circulation. 2000;101:1282.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison of Rectilinear Biphasic Versus Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks

Suneet Mittal, MD; Shervin Ayati, MSEE; Kenneth M. Stein, MD; David Schwartzman, MD; Doris Cavlovich, RN, BSN; Patrick J. Tchou, MD; Steven M. Markowitz, MD; David J. Slotwiner, MD; Marc A. Scheiner, MD; Bruce B. Lerman, MD

From The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (S.M., K.M.S., S.M.M., D.J.S., M.A.S., B.B.L.); Zoll Medical Corporation, Burlington, Mass (S.A.); University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.S., D.C.); and Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (P.J.T.).

Correspondence to Bruce B. Lerman, MD, Division of Cardiology, The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 4, New York, NY 10021. E-mail blerman{at}mail.med.cornell.edu

Background—Clinical studies have shown that biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks for ventricular defibrillation. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a rectilinear biphasic waveform with a standard damped sine wave monophasic waveform for the transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Methods and Results—In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, patients undergoing transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation were randomized to receive either damped sine wave monophasic or rectilinear biphasic shocks. Patients randomized to the monophasic protocol (n=77) received sequential shocks of 100, 200, 300, and 360 J. Patients randomized to the biphasic protocol (n=88) received sequential shocks of 70, 120, 150, and 170 J. First-shock efficacy with the 70-J biphasic waveform (60 of 88 patients, 68%) was significantly greater than that with the 100-J monophasic waveform (16 of 77 patients, 21%, P<0.0001), and it was achieved with 50% less delivered current (11±1 versus 22±4 A, P<0.0001). Similarly, the cumulative efficacy with the biphasic waveform (83 of 88 patients, 94%) was significantly greater than that with the monophasic waveform (61 of 77 patients, 79%; P=0.005). The following 3 variables were independently associated with successful cardioversion: use of a biphasic waveform (relative risk, 4.2; 95% confidence intervals, 1.3 to 13.9; P=0.02), transthoracic impedance (relative risk, 0.64 per 10-{Omega} increase in impedance; 95% confidence intervals, 0.46 to 0.90; P=0.005), and duration of atrial fibrillation (relative risk, 0.97 per 30 days of atrial fibrillation; 95% confidence intervals, 0.96 to 0.99; P=0.02).

Conclusions—For transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, rectilinear biphasic shocks have greater efficacy (and require less energy) than damped sine wave monophasic shocks.


Key Words: cardioversion • atrial fibrillation • shock




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
B M Glover, S J Walsh, C J McCann, M J Moore, G Manoharan, G W N Dalzell, A McAllister, B McClements, D J McEneaney, T G Trouton, et al.
Biphasic energy selection for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The BEST AF Trial
Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 884 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al.
Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2803 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al.
Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association
Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1006 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. M. Alegret, X. Vinolas, J. Sagrista, A. Hernandez-Madrid, L. Perez, X. Sabate, L. Mont, A. Medina, and on behalf of the REVERSE Study Investigators
Predictors of success and effect of biphasic energy on electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 942 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. C. Manegold, C. W. Israel, J. R. Ehrlich, G. Duray, D. Pajitnev, F. T. Wegener, and S. H. Hohnloser
External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2007; 28(14): 1731 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
S. J. Walsh, G. Manoharan, O. J. Escalona, J. Santos, N. Evans, J. McC. Anderson, M. Stevenson, J. D. Allen, and A.A. J. Adgey
Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Europace, October 1, 2006; 8(10): 873 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Writing Committee Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 651 - 745.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N. Dagres, G. Karatasakis, F. Panou, G. Athanassopoulos, T. Maounis, E. Tsougos, K. Kourea, I. Malakos, D. Th. Kremastinos, and D. V. Cokkinos
Pre-treatment with Irbesartan attenuates left atrial stunning after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2006; 27(17): 2062 - 2068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): e149 - e246.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): e257 - e354.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
S. Stec, A. Gorecki, B. Zaborska, and P. Kulakowski
A simple point score system for predicting the efficacy of external rectilinear biphasic cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation.
Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 5: Electrical Therapies: Automated External Defibrillators, Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Pacing
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-35 - IV-46.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. McKeown and A. E. Epstein
Future Directions: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 61S - 64S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. J. Walsh, D. McCarty, A. J.J. McClelland, C. G. Owens, T. G. Trouton, M. T. Harbinson, S. O'Mullan, A. McAllister, B. M. McClements, M. Stevenson, et al.
Impedance compensated biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a multi-centre comparison of antero-apical and antero-posterior pad positions
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2005; 26(13): 1298 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kirchhof, G. Monnig, K. Wasmer, A. Heinecke, G. Breithardt, L. Eckardt, and D. Bocker
A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA)
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2005; 26(13): 1292 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Zohar, M. Kovacic, M. Brezocnik, and M. Podbregar
Prediction of maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation by non-deterministic modelling
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(5): 500 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Sticherling, S. Behrens, W. Kamke, A. Stahn, and M. Zabel
Comparison of acute and long-term effects of single-dose amiodarone and verapamil for the treatment of immediate recurrences of atrial fibrillation after transthoracic cardioversion
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(6): 546 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P J B Hubner, S Gupta, and I McClellan
Simplified cardioversion service with intravenous midazolam
Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1447 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A A J Adgey and S J Walsh
Theory and practice of defibrillation: (1) Atrial fibrillation and DC conversion
Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1493 - 1498.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D Pavin, H Legrand, C Leclercq, C Crocq, P Mabo, and J C Daubert
Transvenous low energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation refractory to external cardioversion: do non-obese patients benefit?
Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 332 - 333.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. S. Channer, A. Birchall, R. P. Steeds, S. J. Walters, W. W. Yeo, J. N. West, R. Muthusamy, W. E. Rhoden, B. T. Saeed, P. Batin, et al.
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-treatment and short- or long-term maintenance therapy with amiodarone supporting DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2004; 25(2): 144 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. L. McNamara, L. J. Tamariz, J. B. Segal, and E. B. Bass
Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Evidence for the Role of Pharmacologic Therapy, Electrical Cardioversion, and Echocardiography
Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2003; 139(12): 1018 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Scholten, T Szili-Torok, P Klootwijk, and L Jordaens
Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1032 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
Ph. Ricard, K. Yaici, J.P. Rinaldi, M. Bergonzi, and N. Saoudi
Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: how and when?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2003; 5(suppl_H): H40 - H44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S K S Lairikyengbam, M H Anderson, and A G Davies
Present treatment options for atrial fibrillation
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2003; 79(928): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
C. Sticherling, M. Ozaydin, H. Tada, H. Oral, F. Pelosi, B. P. Knight, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady
Comparison of Verapamil and Ibutilide for the Suppression of Immediate Recurrences of Atrial Fibrillation after Transthoracic Cardioversion
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2002; 7(3): 155 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. L. Page, R. E. Kerber, J. K. Russell, T. Trouton, J. Waktare, D. Gallik, J. E. Olgin, P. Ricard, G. W. Dalzell, R. Reddy, et al.
Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: The results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1956 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
W. S. Aronow
Management of the Older Person With Atrial Fibrillation
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2002; 57(6): M352 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2001; 22(20): 1852 - 1923.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, G. N. Kay, W. W. Klein, S. Levy, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1266 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. H. Falk
Atrial Fibrillation
N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2001; 344(14): 1067 - 1078.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. J. G. M. Crijns
Internal cardioversion as a first-line method of cardioversion?
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(1): 2 - 3.
[PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Biphasic Better Than Monophasic Shock in AF?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, June 1, 2000; 2000(601): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
No Shock That Biphasics Are Better for Cardioversion of AF
Journal Watch Cardiology, May 5, 2000; 2000(505): 9 - 9.
[Full Text]