This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kay, G. N. Articles by Investigators for the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study, Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kay, G. N. Articles by Investigators for the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study,

(Circulation. 1999;100:2344.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Risks of Spontaneous Injury and Extraction of an Active Fixation Pacemaker Lead

Report of the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study and Worldwide Registry

G. Neal Kay, MD; Jeffrey A. Brinker, MD; David T. Kawanishi, MD; Charles J. Love, MD; Margaret A. Lloyd, MD; Russell C. Reeves, MD; Guy Pioger, MD; JoAnn Fee, RN, BSN; Mary K. Overland, PhD; Lisa Garnsey Ensign, MS; Gary L. Grunkemeier, PhD; for the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study Investigators

From the University of Alabama, Birmingham (G.N.K., R.C.R.), Johns Hopkins University (J.A.B.), Baltimore, Md; University of Southern California (D.T.K.), Los Angeles; Ohio State University (C.J.L.), Columbus; Mayo Clinic Foundation (M.A.L.), Rochester, Minn; Clinique Alleray-Labrousse (G.P.), Paris, France; Accufix Research Institute (J.F., M.K.O., L.G.E.), Denver, Colo; and Medical Data Research Center (G.L.G.), Providence Health System, Portland, Ore.

Correspondence to G. Neal Kay, MD, 321J Tinsley Harrison Tower, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294.

Background—The Telectronics Accufix pacing leads were recalled in November 1994 after 2 deaths and 2 nonfatal injuries were reported. This multicenter clinical study (MCS) of patients with Accufix leads was designed to determine the rate of spontaneous injury related to the J retention wire and results of lead extraction.

Methods and Results—The MCS included 2589 patients with Accufix atrial pacing leads that were implanted at or who were followed up at 12 medical centers. Patients underwent cinefluoroscopic imaging of their lead every 6 months. The risk of J retention wire fracture was 5.6%/y at 5 years and 4.7%/y at 10 years after implantation. The annual risk of protrusion was 1.5%. A total of 40 spontaneous injuries were reported to a worldwide registry (WWR) that included data from 34 672 patients (34 892 Accufix leads), including pericardial tamponade (n=19), pericardial effusion (n=5), atrial perforation (n=3), J retention wire embolization (n=4), and death (n=6). The risk of injury was 0.02%/y (95% CI, 0.0025 to 0.072) in the MCS and 0.048%/y (95% CI, 0.035 to 0.067) in the WWR. A total of 5299 leads (13%) have been extracted worldwide. After recall in the WWR, fatal extraction complications occurred in 0.4% of intravascular procedures (16 of 4023), with life-threatening complications in 0.5% (n=21). Extraction complications increased with implant duration, female sex, and J retention wire protrusion.

Conclusions—Accufix pacing leads pose a low, ongoing risk of injury. Extraction is associated with substantially higher risks, and a conservative management approach is indicated for most patients.

Key Words: pacemakers • pacing • complications

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Amin, D. B. Matchar, M. A. Wood, and K. A. Ellenbogen Management of recalled pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a decision analysis model. JAMA, July 26, 2006; 296(4): 412 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Conservative Approach for Extraction of Accufix Leads Journal Watch Cardiology, January 21, 2000; 2000(121): 10 - 10. [Full Text]